|
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bob Martinez Center 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 |
Storage Tanks & Contamination Monitoring Information |
|||||||||
| Journal Report | |||||||||||
| Report Run Date: 04/29/2025 Last Data Refresh: 04/28/2025 Report Generated from DOPPLER | |||||||||||
| Facility ID: | 8519617 | ||||||||||
| Facility Name: | PATS FOOD MART | ||||||||||
| 12/03/2024 | TCAR Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 12/03/2024 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 12/03/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 12/03/2024 | Document Management Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Closure Document | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 12/03/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 12/03/2024 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Pat's Mart Closure Report_9.8.24 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 09/19/2024 | Editable Letter Activity | Muslic, Adis | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Description: | UT-819 09-16-2021 Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 09/19/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 09/19/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 09/19/2024 | User: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | CAO letter | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 07/24/2024 | Document Management Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Closure Document | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/24/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 07/24/2024 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Lab Results 2024JUL17 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 07/23/2024 | Discharge Reporting Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 07/24/2024 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/24/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 07/23/2024 | Editable Letter Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Site Assessment Request | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/23/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 07/23/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 07/23/2024 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | SAR #2024-07-23 ST 51 PAS | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 07/23/2024 | Document Management Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Discharge Report Form | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Description: | 26 August 2021 in compliance letter | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/23/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 07/23/2024 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Discharge Report Form | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 06/20/2024 | Editable Letter Activity | Muslic, Adis | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/20/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 06/20/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 06/20/2024 | User: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 06/13/2024 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Muslic, Adis | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 06/13/2024 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 09/19/2024 | Activity Closed By: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 09/19/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/21/2024 | User: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Equipment: EQ-156 Tank - Modern Welding Glasteel 11 UST EQ-697 Overfill Protection - OPW 70SO Drop Tubes EQ-708 Spill Containment - OPW DW Edge EQ-615 Piping Sumps - S Bravo Fiberglass EQ-335 Line Leak Detectors - Red Jacket Mechanical EQ-196 Release Detection - Veeder Root TLS 350 EQ-614 Release Detection - Liquid Sensors | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 09/19/2024 | User: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Received Financial Responsibility Records for the new tank (Tank 8): Mt. Hawley Insurance Company Part D Certificate of Insurance and Part P Certificate of Financial Responsibility (8/23/2024-8/23/2025). | ||||||||||
| 06/13/2024 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Muslic, Adis | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 06/13/2024 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 09/19/2024 | Activity Closed By: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 09/19/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/21/2024 | User: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Equipment: EQ-156 Tank - Modern Welding Glasteel 11 UST EQ-697 Overfill Protection - OPW 70SO Drop Tubes EQ-708 Spill Containment - OPW DW Edge EQ-615 Piping Sumps - S Bravo Fiberglass EQ-335 Line Leak Detectors - Red Jacket Mechanical EQ-196 Release Detection - Veeder Root TLS 350 EQ-614 Release Detection - Liquid Sensors | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 09/19/2024 | User: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Received Financial Responsibility Records for the new tank (Tank 8): Mt. Hawley Insurance Company Part D Certificate of Insurance and Part P Certificate of Financial Responsibility (8/23/2024-8/23/2025). | ||||||||||
| 06/07/2024 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | TUCKER, SHARYN | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 06/07/2024 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 06/20/2024 | Activity Closed By: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/20/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/12/2024 | User: | MUSLIC_A_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Records Review: Placard: Provided by email; expires 6/30/2024. Financial Responsibility: ACE American Insurance Company Part D Certificate of Insurance and Part P Financial Responsibility (8/23/2023-8/23/2024 (covering 3 USTs)) Release Detection: See Facility Records Section. Received photo documentation showing that all of the dispenser sumps and piping were removed. Received scrap ticket showing that Southern Tank Company picked up the tanks to serve for fire hydrant water storage. Submit the following documents: 1. Underground Storage System Installation and Removal Form for Certified Contractors (DEP Form: 62-761.900(5)) form no more than 21 days after removal of a storage tank system. Form must be submitted by 7/11/2024. 2. Closure Assessment Report no more than 60 days of completion of the closure. Report must be submitted by 8/19/2024. | ||||||||||
| 05/13/2024 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6056 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d), 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.600(1)(g) | ||||||||||
| 05/13/2024 | Editable Letter Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/14/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document has been approved | Date: | 05/14/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Approved by George K. Juaristic: OK | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 05/13/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 05/13/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Submitted for approval by: SHARYN TUCKER | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 05/13/2024 | User: | TUCKER_SX_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | CAO letter.pdf | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 05/13/2024 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6014 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.430(2) | ||||||||||
| 05/13/2024 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6056 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d), 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.600(1)(g) | ||||||||||
| 05/13/2024 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6073 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(3)(b), 62-761.700(3)(b)1, 62-761.700(3)(b)2 | ||||||||||
| 05/13/2024 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6073 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(3)(b), 62-761.700(3)(b)1, 62-761.700(3)(b)2 | ||||||||||
| 05/03/2024 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | TUCKER, SHARYN | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 04/30/2024 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/13/2024 | Activity Closed By: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/13/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/03/2024 | User: | TUCKER_SX_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Inspection Comments Records Review: Financial Responsibility: ACE American Insurance Company Part D Insurance Endorsement and Part P forms; 8/23/23-8/23/24. Release Detection: See Reviewed Records section. (2) tank interstices visually inspected and documented on logs in 2023. Observed no visual inspection of tank interstices were done in 2024. * No visual inspection of tank interstices were done in 2024. Corrective action: Conduct visual inspections at least once a month, but not exceeding 35 days, and send the next 3 consecutive months of the tank interstitial conditions to the program office. Tests: See System Tests section. MONTHLY MAINTENANCE VISUALS: 3/18/2022 to 4/30/2024: Monthly visual inspections included: release detection, fill port/spill bucket, dispenser containment, dispenser components conducted at least once every 35 days. All visual records do not reflect the conditions observed before they were corrected. *AOC Visual Inspection log does not reflect the conditions at the time of inspection. Compliance technician documents the conditions after he pumps out the sumps/UDC/SB’s. EX/ condition show “dry” however action notes show water was pumped out. Corrective action: Show the true conditions of the storage tank components prior to pumping/repairing. Report will be emailed to: 496gall@apecgas.com; bobwood@southeastern-petroleum.com | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2024 | Violation Open | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6013 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.420(3), 62-761.420(4), 62-761.420(8) | ||||||||||
| 06/26/2023 | Electronic Communication Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 06/26/2023 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Date: | 06/26/2023 | ||||||||||
| Recipient: | Bob Wood [BobWoodSPCI@icloud.com] | ||||||||||
| Sender: | George Juaristic | ||||||||||
| Subject: | Re: MY LIST (NOI) | ||||||||||
| Message: |
Thanks Bob.
Here are the facilities on my Task Assignment:
8623483 A&K EXXON PALM HARBOR 36300 US HWY 19 N PALM HARBOR 34684
8519836 GALL SHELL 3944 GALL BLVD ZEPHYRHILLS 33541
9814903 SUNRISE FOOD MART #147 13006 COUNTY LINE RD HUDSON 34667
8519617 PATS FOOD MART 3525 GALL BLVD ZEPHYRHILLS 33541
8626558 SAV-A-TON 4334 GALL BLVD ZEPHYRHILLS 33542
8519777 CITGO-IRSHAID OIL INC 36952 HWY 54 W ZEPHYRHILLS 33599
8514943 4449 NEW PORT RICHEY INC 4449 GRAND BLVD NEW PORT RICHEY 34652
8519950 MOBIL #02-GFG HOLIDAY 1940 US 19 N HOLIDAY 34691
9103115 CHEVRON-ELFERS 6022 HWY 54 NEW PORT RICHEY 34653
8519794 HESS FOOD MART 9400 US 19 N PORT RICHEY 33568
9801193 CITGO-HUDSON 14106 US HWY 19 HUDSON 34667
8626629 HUDSON FAST STOP 14316 US HIGHWAY 19 HUDSON 34667
8519886 HUDSON ONE LLC 15434 HWY 19 N HUDSON 34667
8515031 SMART DEAL OF DADE CITY LLC 14113 US HWY 98 BYPASS & CHURCH ST DADE CITY 33525
8515051 FOOD MAX-AAYAN INVESTMENT INC 37006 LOCK ST DADE CITY 33525
8515002 EXPRESS FOOD STORE 37511 LOCK ST DADE CITY 33523
8515091 VAUGHANS COUNTRY STORE 34550 BLANTON RD DADE CITY 33523
8514870 7-STAR FOOD STORE #6 26566 HWY 54 W LUTZ 33549
8515048 LAND O LAKES FOOD MASTER 7715 LAND O LAKES BLVD LAND O LAKES 34639
8514985 54 GAS AND FOOD MART 7424 HWY 54 NEW PORT RICHEY 34653
I will need to conduct a routine inspection of the fuel tank(s) at the above subject facilities over the next few months. Please let me know when you would be able to accommodate these inspections. Please ensure someone is onsite to provide access to the storage tank components. Also, please ensure all records are available for review at the time of inspection. You can view the Preparing for a Storage Tank Inspection Information Video¿on the FDEP website : http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/tanks/default.htm for information on the inspection process.
Please review the previous inspection to help prepare and ensure that this facility remains in compliance. If you don’t have copies of the previous inspections, you can find them at Florida Department of Environmental Protection Electronic Document Management System (OCULUS) https://depedms.dep.state.fl.us/Oculus/servlet/login?loginState=loginInvalidPassword. Click on “Public Oculus Login”, select “Storage Tanks” under the category tab, then select “Property” under the Search by tab, then select “Facility-Site ID” under the Property tab. You can then enter the facility ID# to search all the documents for the facility.
Thanks again,
George Juaristic
Environmental Specialist II
Storage Tank Compliance-Department of Health in Pinellas County
Office: (727) 485-1817
From: Robert Wood |
||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/26/2023 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6053 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.500(7)(c), 62-761.500(7)(c)1, 62-761.500(7)(c)2, 62-761.500(7)(d) | ||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Editable Letter Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 05/17/2022 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/17/2022 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 05/17/2022 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter 2022.05.17 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Violation Open | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6013 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.420(3), 62-761.420(4), 62-761.420(8) | ||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6068 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(e) | ||||||||||
| 03/17/2022 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 03/17/2022 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/17/2022 | Activity Closed By: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/17/2022 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 03/17/2022 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Records Review: Placard: Onfile in Compliance Binder; expires 6/30/2022. Financial Responsibility: Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co. *(3) Last policy reviewed expired 8/2/2020. No proof of financial responsibility/assurance provided at time of inspection. UST Training Certificates: A/B and C onfile in Compliance Binder. Release Detection: See Reviewed Records section. *(4) Facility hasn't been inspecting the PUL tank. They were told that the tank is out-of-service. Although the store isn't selling PUL and the primary tank contains <1" of fuel, the PUL tank is still registered as out-of-service. Inspect all tanks until the PUL tank is properly taken out-of-service. Tests: See System Tests section. *(5) Facility didn't test the release detection (MLLD) or overfill protection device (ball float valve) for the PUL tank. They thought the tank was taken out-of-service. The PUL tank is still registered as in-service. Continue testing the release detection and overfill protection devices until the PUL tank is taken out-of-service. 12/17/2021 SPCI 2 DW SCU DSL FSV, RUL BFV 3 STP, 7 UDC 2 RJ MLLD 12/3/2020 2 RJ MLLD DSL FSV, RUL BFV Report will be emailed to NIRUBEN PATEL PRESIDENT [bobwood@spci@icloud.com]. | ||||||||||
| 06/29/2021 | Electronic Communication Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 06/29/2021 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Date: | 06/29/2021 | ||||||||||
| Recipient: | Bob Wood [Bobwoodspci@icloud.com] | ||||||||||
| Sender: | George Juaristic | ||||||||||
| Subject: | see attached Noi | ||||||||||
| Message: | see attached NOI | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/29/2021 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 06/29/2021 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Email to RP: Notice of Inspection | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 08/22/2019 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 4077 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(3)(b), 62-761.700(3)(b)1., 62-761.700(3)(b)2. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/25/2010 | User: | OWENS_JS_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Placard cert # 313135 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/17/2022 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 3/18/2022_PUL still contains 6" of product. The primary tank has been pumped down to ~1" of product and the store isn't selling high-grade or mid-grade gas. | ||||||||||
| 08/22/2019 | Editable Letter Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Description: | ICL | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/22/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 08/22/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 08/22/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Email to RP: CA Inspection Report, CAO Letter, and STRF | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 08/22/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | CAO Letter 8.22.2019 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 08/22/2019 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 4077 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(3)(b), 62-761.700(3)(b)1., 62-761.700(3)(b)2. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/25/2010 | User: | OWENS_JS_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Placard cert # 313135 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/17/2022 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 3/18/2022_PUL still contains 6" of product. The primary tank has been pumped down to ~1" of product and the store isn't selling high-grade or mid-grade gas. | ||||||||||
| 08/19/2019 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 08/08/2019 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 08/22/2019 | Activity Closed By: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/22/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/22/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Report will be emailed to Mike Patel [mukesh151175@yahoo.com], Robert Wood [bobwoodspci@icloud.com], and Leslie Pedigo [Leslie.Pedigo@FloridaDEP.gov] | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 08/22/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Compliance Assistance Inspection Approval 7/25/2019 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 05/22/2019 | Enforcement Tracking Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Open | ||||||||||
| 05/21/2019 | Enforcement Referral Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Accepted | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/22/2019 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was acknowledged on this date | Date: | 05/22/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Acknowledged and Assigned by Jayme Brock | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been assigned | Date: | 05/22/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Assigned to Leslie Pedigo | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/22/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was accepted on this date | Date: | 05/22/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Accepted by Leslie Pedigo: O.K. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 05/21/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Submitted for approval by: George K. Juaristic: Enforcement referral memo, corporate filing sheet, and property appraiser sheet attached. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/21/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Enforcement referral memo, corporate filing sheet, and property appraiser sheet attached. | ||||||||||
| 05/20/2019 | Electronic Communication Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/20/2019 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Date: | 05/20/2019 | ||||||||||
| Recipient: | mukesh151175@yahoo.com | ||||||||||
| Sender: | George Juaristic | ||||||||||
| Subject: | 8519617 Yogi Kyupa 1, Inc (Pat's Food Mart) | ||||||||||
| Message: | Good morning Mr. Patel, There are several outstanding violations from the 2/11/2019 routine compliance inspection at the above subject facilities: • Type: Violation • Significance: Minor • Rule: 62-761.700(3)(b), 62-761.700(3)(b)1., 62-761.700(3)(b)2. • Violation Text: Spill containment, sumps, and interstices not accessible. Water/regulated substances not timely removed. Petroleum contact water not properly managed. • Explanation: The PUL tank interstice contained 6" product. • Corrective Action: Remove and properly dispose of the product in the PUL tank interstice. Take the PUL tank out-of-service. *PUL tank has reportedly been emptied. Please register the tank as out-of-service. • Type: Violation • Significance: Minor • Rule: 62-761.700(1), 62-761.700(1)(a), 62-761.700(1)(a)1., 62-761.700(1)(a)2. • Violation Text: Storage tank system has a not repaired component which has or could cause a release or discharge. • Explanation: The penetrations in UDC 1/2 are damaged. • Corrective Action: Repair/replace the damaged boots in UDC 1/2. • Type: Violation • Significance: SNC-B • Rule: 62-761.700(1)(b), 62-761.700(1)(b)1., 62-761.700(1)(b)2. • Violation Text: Storage tank system not taken out of operation until repair is made. • Explanation: The PUL interstice contained 6" product. • Corrective Action: Take the PUL tank out-of-service immediately. *PUL tank has reportedly been emptied. Please register the tank as out-of-service. • Type: Violation • Significance: Minor • Rule: 62-761.700(1), 62-761.700(1)(a), 62-761.700(1)(a)1., 62-761.700(1)(a)2. • Violation Text: Storage tank system has a not repaired component which has or could cause a release or discharge. • Explanation: The PUL tank interstice contained 6" product. • Corrective Action: Take the PUL tank out-of-service. *PUL tank has reportedly been emptied. Please register the tank as out-of-service. • Type: Violation • Significance: Minor • Rule: 62-761.500(1)(d)5. • Violation Text: Failure to allow for/perform a breach of integrity test. • Explanation: A BOI test was requested for the Diesel tank on 05/16/2012. It doesn't appear that the BOI test has been conducted. The 05/16/2012 was inadvertently resolved. • Corrective Action: Perform a BOI test on the DSL tank and submit the test results to this office. • Violation Coments:2/11/2019_The DSL tank interstice contained 4" of water at the time of inspection. The violations have been open for 90-days. This facility will be referred, to the DEP-SW District, for enforcement today. Thanks, George K Juaristic Florida Department of Health Pinellas County Petroleum Storage Tank Compliance Tarpon Springs Center 301 S Disston Ave Tarpon Springs FL 34689 Office 727-485-1817 Cell 727-543-5319 Fax 727-538-7293 george.juaristic@flhealth.gov EFFECTIVE 12/4/2018 New Office # 727-485-1817 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/20/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/13/2019 | Record Document Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: |
Robert Wood |
Activity Closed Date: | 05/20/2019 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/20/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2019 | Issue Document Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Mukesh Patel, Manager | Activity Closed Date: | 05/02/2019 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/02/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2019 | Issue Document Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | File | Activity Closed Date: | 05/02/2019 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/02/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 05/02/2019 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Case Closure Memo | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 04/30/2019 | Issue Document Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Patel, Niruben | Activity Closed Date: | 04/30/2019 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/30/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2019 | Electronic Communication Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 04/30/2019 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Date: | 04/30/2019 | ||||||||||
| Recipient: | mukesh151175@yahoo.com | ||||||||||
| Sender: | George Juaristic | ||||||||||
| Subject: | see attached | ||||||||||
| Message: | see attached | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/30/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 02/19/2019 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 4068 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1), 62-761.700(1)(a), 62-761.700(1)(a)1., 62-761.700(1)(a)2. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/17/2022 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 3/18/2022_UDC 1/2 piping penetrations haven't been repaired but the UDC did pass the 12/17/2021 hydro test. | ||||||||||
| 02/19/2019 | Editable Letter Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 02/19/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/19/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 02/19/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Email to RP with attached report and CAO Letter. | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 02/19/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | CAO Letter 2.19.2019 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 02/19/2019 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 4068 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1), 62-761.700(1)(a), 62-761.700(1)(a)1., 62-761.700(1)(a)2. | ||||||||||
| 02/19/2019 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 4069 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(b), 62-761.700(1)(b)1., 62-761.700(1)(b)2. | ||||||||||
| 02/19/2019 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 4077 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(3)(b), 62-761.700(3)(b)1., 62-761.700(3)(b)2. | ||||||||||
| 02/19/2019 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 4006 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(3), 62-761.400(3)(a), 62-761.400(3)(b), 62-761.400(3)(c) | ||||||||||
| 02/19/2019 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 4076 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(3), 62-761.700(3)(a), 62-761.700(3)(a)1., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.d., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.e., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.f., 62-761.700(3)(a)2. | ||||||||||
| 02/19/2019 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 4059 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d), 62-761.600(1)(e) | ||||||||||
| 02/14/2019 | Electronic Communication Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/14/2019 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Date: | 02/14/2019 | ||||||||||
| Recipient: | Mukesh "Mike" Patel [mukesh151175@yahoo.com] | ||||||||||
| Sender: | George Juaristic | ||||||||||
| Subject: | see attached | ||||||||||
| Message: | see attached | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/14/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 02/11/2019 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 02/11/2019 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/19/2019 | Activity Closed By: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/19/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/19/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | There was an outstanding violation for product found in the RUL and PUL spill bucket secondaries. They were vacuum tested on 10/2/2018 and both reportedly passed. This violation is resolved. There is also an outstanding violation for not performing a BOI test on the DSL tank. This violation will remain open. Test the DSL tank. Report will be emailed to Mukesh Patel [mukesh151175@yahoo.com] and Robert Wood [bobwoodspci@icloud.com]. | ||||||||||
| 01/29/2019 | Electronic Communication Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 01/29/2019 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Date: | 01/29/2019 | ||||||||||
| Recipient: | Vijay Patel | ||||||||||
| Sender: | George Juaristic | ||||||||||
| Subject: | see attached | ||||||||||
| Message: | see attached | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/29/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 01/29/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Email to RP to schedule routine inspection. | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 04/19/2016 | Editable Letter Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Description: | IC 2018 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 04/19/2016 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Tue Apr 19 00:00:00 EDT 2016 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/19/2016 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 04/19/2016 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 19APR2016.GKJ_NCL | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 04/12/2016 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1020 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.500(1)(d)5. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | The breach of integrity test is intended for closed interstices only. A closed interstice has no unsecured or unsealed opening to the outside. Double-walled piping without a boot connector, or if the boot has a bleed valve (for tightness testing), is considered an open interstice. The breach of integrity test may be performed by using at least one of the following methods: a. A continuous hydrostatic system b. A continuous vacuum system c. Testing of the interstice for liquid tightness in accordance with manufacturer's installation instructions; or d. Another method in accordance with subsection 62-761.850(2). How the breach of integrity test is performed or to what degree can depend on the depth to groundwater at each facility. When the tank and or piping are fully submerged, the lack of water intrusion into the secondary containment may be considered a verification of its integrity. However, when total submersion is not the case, one of the rule stipulated options must be used. The breach of integrity test should not be confused with a precision tightness test, which tests the primary tank or piping only. The breach of integrity test will test the secondary and primary shells, but is not a precision test. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/19/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2/11/2019_The DSL tank interstice contained 4" of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/17/2022 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 3/18/2022_DSL interstice was dry at time of inspection. No integrity test results for the DSL tank. | ||||||||||
| 04/12/2016 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 04/12/2016 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 04/19/2016 | Activity Closed By: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/19/2016 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 04/12/2016 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1020 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.500(1)(d)5. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | The breach of integrity test is intended for closed interstices only. A closed interstice has no unsecured or unsealed opening to the outside. Double-walled piping without a boot connector, or if the boot has a bleed valve (for tightness testing), is considered an open interstice. The breach of integrity test may be performed by using at least one of the following methods: a. A continuous hydrostatic system b. A continuous vacuum system c. Testing of the interstice for liquid tightness in accordance with manufacturer's installation instructions; or d. Another method in accordance with subsection 62-761.850(2). How the breach of integrity test is performed or to what degree can depend on the depth to groundwater at each facility. When the tank and or piping are fully submerged, the lack of water intrusion into the secondary containment may be considered a verification of its integrity. However, when total submersion is not the case, one of the rule stipulated options must be used. The breach of integrity test should not be confused with a precision tightness test, which tests the primary tank or piping only. The breach of integrity test will test the secondary and primary shells, but is not a precision test. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/19/2019 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2/11/2019_The DSL tank interstice contained 4" of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/17/2022 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 3/18/2022_DSL interstice was dry at time of inspection. No integrity test results for the DSL tank. | ||||||||||
| 08/31/2015 | Electronic Communication Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 08/31/2015 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Date: | 08/31/2015 | ||||||||||
| Recipient: | Bob Wood (robertlwood@earthlink.net) | ||||||||||
| Sender: | George Juaristic | ||||||||||
| Subject: | Pasco Inspections | ||||||||||
| Message: | Here’s the list of remaining facilities for Pasco and one facility I have in Pinellas: Pinellas Cnty: 1. Shell-Tarpon Springs, 801 N Pinellas Ave Pasco Cnty: 1. Sunoco, 5736 Hwy 19, NPR (**listed as APEC site on registration) 2. Sunoco, 4015 Little Rd, NPR 3. Moon Lake BP, 9550 Moon Lake Rd, NPR 4. Citgo-52, 7820 Hwy 52, Hudson 5. Citgo-South 52, 11941 SR 52, Hudson (**Closure assessment for 05/08/2013 closure for the RUL spill bucket was due on 07/08/2013; Closure assessment for the 06/19/2013 closure of the RUL and DSL STP boots was due on 08/19/2013. Closure assessment has not been received as of 05/30/2014; Closure assessment was due on 02/06/2014.) 6. Citgo-Zephyrhills, 3525 Gall Blvd, Zeph (***2/21/2014 inspection report attached-too many violations to list.) Let me know when your guys will be conducting their monthlies in September and I will meet them out there. If there are outstanding violations at the site, I put them in parentheses. George Juaristic Attached: TCI 2.21.14 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/31/2015 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 02/28/2014 | Editable Letter Activity | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/28/2014 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 02/28/2014 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Fri Feb 28 00:00:00 EST 2014 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 28FEB2014.GKJ_NCL. | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 02/24/2014 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1091 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(2)(e) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Note repair issues in rule 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)2, 62-761.700(1)(a)3, 62-761.700(1)(a)4, 62-761.700(1)(a)5 & 62-761.700(1)(a)6. Also note record keeping problems in rules 62-761.710(1) & 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 02/24/2014 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 02/21/2014 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/28/2014 | Activity Closed By: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/28/2014 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 02/24/2014 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1106 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)2. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | For systems or components that were required to shut down, check the product inventory data to confirm. | ||||||||||
| 02/24/2014 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
| 02/24/2014 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1062 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 02/24/2014 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1004 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(3)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | There are various financial responsibility mechanisms available: Risk Retention Group (RRG) Endorsements Certificate of Insurance Guarantee Letter of Credit Fully Funded Trust Fund Self-Insurance with letter from CFO Stand-by Trust Fund Bond Rating Test (Local Governments) Local Government Financial Test Local Government Guarantee Local Government Fund For detailed information, refer to the DEP's Financial Responsibility Handbook pages 2-1, 2-2. Verify which mechanism(s) are used by the facility. State and federal facilities are exempt from financial responsibility, being considered a type of self insurance. They are always in compliance for this category. Document state or federal as appropriate. Financial responsibility must be maintained on out-of-service tanks. Note: Mark the absence of/or the lack of complete info in the certification of financial responsibility under Rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 02/21/2014 | Violation Closed | Juaristic, George K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1025 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.500(2)(a) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Document deviation from all manufacturers' requirements. Obtain and review installation instructions. It is a good idea to accumulate a library of tank system specifications for either your office or yourself. | ||||||||||
| 07/05/2013 | Enforcement Tracking Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Activity Result: | Closed Without Enforcement | Activity Closed Date: | 05/02/2019 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/02/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 06/24/2013 | Enforcement Referral Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Accepted | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 07/05/2013 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 06/24/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Submitted for approval by Randall Strauss | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/05/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was accepted on this date | Date: | 07/05/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Accepted by: Leslie Pedigo: O.K. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been assigned | Date: | 07/05/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Assigned to Leslie Pedigo | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was acknowledged on this date | Date: | 07/05/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Acknowledged and Assigned by: Laurel Culbreth | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/24/2013 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Water intrusion and failed integrity tests of tank interstices not investigated and repaired. Monthly release detection inspection records not available. | ||||||||||
| 06/12/2013 | Enforcement Referral Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Withdrawn | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 06/12/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Submitted for approval by Randall Strauss | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been withdrawn from submission by the requestor | Date: | 06/24/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Withdrawn by Randall Strauss: Referral activity withdrawn due to attachment tab not active to add supporting document attachments for the referral - will re-submit | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/12/2013 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Water intrusion and failed integrity tests of tank interstices not investigated and repaired. Monthly release detection inspection records not available. | ||||||||||
| 06/12/2013 | Editable Letter Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | County Subsequent Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 06/12/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Wed Jun 12 00:00:00 EDT 2013 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/12/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 06/12/2013 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | NCL-2 6.12.13 operator | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 06/12/2013 | Editable Letter Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | County Subsequent Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 06/12/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Wed Jun 12 00:00:00 EDT 2013 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/12/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 06/12/2013 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | NCL-2 6.12.13 owner | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Incident Activity | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Has not led to Discharge | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 08/09/2019 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/09/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Editable Letter Activity | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/02/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 05/02/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Thu May 02 00:00:00 EDT 2013 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 05/02/2013 | User: | LONGEN_JL_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2013May2.JLL. cover letter | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/02/2013 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/02/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 05/02/2013 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/02/2013 | Activity Closed By: | LONGEN_JL_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/02/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 04/19/2016 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 12APR2016.GKJ_It doesn't appear that the sump has been hydro-tested. Test the sump and submit the test results to this office. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_No hydrostatic test results have been submitted to this office. | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 04/19/2016 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 12APR2016.GKJ_It doesn't appear that the sump has been hydro-tested. Test the sump and submit the test results to this office. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_No hydrostatic test results have been submitted to this office. | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1062 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1106 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)2. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | For systems or components that were required to shut down, check the product inventory data to confirm. | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_No test results have been received for the spill buckets. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 04/19/2016 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 12APR2016.GKJ_It doesn't appear that the spill buckets have been vacuum tested. Test the spill buckets per manufacturer specifications and submit the test results to this office. | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_No test results have been received for the spill buckets. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 04/19/2016 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 12APR2016.GKJ_It doesn't appear that the spill buckets have been vacuum tested. Test the spill buckets per manufacturer specifications and submit the test results to this office. | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2013 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1063 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(e) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | The electronic monitoring unit is a system consisting of a sensor, wiring, and a panel. The sensor and the component that it monitors are exempt from the visual inspection process. However, the proper operation of the remainder of the electronic system must be verified on a monthly basis. One way to test is to activate the panel alarm switch. Depending on the system in place this test may check the alarm light, alarm horn, or the circuit continuity between the panel and the remote sensor. This test procedure must be documented by the facility, as required in rule 62-761.710(2). The remote verification feature meets this requirement, such as the Veeder-Root Simplicity system. | ||||||||||
| 07/10/2012 | Record Document Activity | Meetze, Alison | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Unknown & Southeastern Petroleum Contractors, Inc. | Activity Closed Date: | 07/10/2012 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/10/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/16/2012 | Editable Letter Activity | Meetze, Alison | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | District Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 05/16/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Wed May 16 00:00:00 EDT 2012 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/16/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | Noncompliance Letter | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 05/15/2012 | Violation Closed | Meetze, Alison | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1138 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.820(1)(a), 62-761.820(1)(b), 62-761.820(1)(c) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if an incident was not investigated, or not investigated properly. See rule 62-761.450(2) for incident reporting requirements. | ||||||||||
| 05/15/2012 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Meetze, Alison | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 05/15/2012 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/16/2012 | Activity Closed By: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/16/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/15/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | Inspection performed 5/15/12 by Alison Meetze & Steve Jarrett. The facility representative was busy with customers and the ATG repair at the time of the inspection, so a signature was not obtained. The facility consists of 3 double-walled USTs, 3 spill buckets, 3 piping sumps, 7 dispensers (and 2 additional satellite diesel dispensers). Records Review: The registration placard, proof of Financial Responsibility, Certificate of Financial Responsibility, annual testing, visual release detection records, and written Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) as part of RD records were available for review. The annual testing performed on 10/18/11 by Clemens Fuel Systems documents passing results for 3 interstitial sensors; only the premium UST has a sensor and it does not appear to be connected to the monitoring panel. These results also document passing results for 3 sumps sensors, which are present, but do not appear to be connected to the monitoring panel. The passing Breach of Integrity tests performed on 3/7/12 by Southeastern Petroleum Contractors, Inc. are questionable. The interstices have regularly been documented as containing liquid since at least 10/15/09. The diesel interstice contained over 4¿ of liquid during this inspection. **Please be advised: The attached Incident Notification Form must be completed and submitted immediately. **Please be advised: An investigation into the source of liquid entry must be completed within 2 weeks. The source of liquid entry must be repaired and Breach of Integrity tests must be performed according to manufacturer specification in the presence of an inspector. Physical Inspection: The spill buckets are labeled, but beginning to fade. The spill buckets were clean and dry, and the interstices of the spill buckets were dry. Overfill prevention appears to be provided by ball check valves. The piping sumps were dry and mostly clean. The premium piping sump lid is broken and should be replaced. The double-wall piping was open to the sumps. Each sump contained a bell sensor, which does not appear to be connected to the monitoring panel. The tank interstices were gauged: the regular and premium were dry; the diesel contained over 4 inches of liquid (the gauge stick did not reach the bottom of the diesel tank). The 4 gas dispenser liners were all dry and mostly clean, with anchored shear valves and hoses in good repair. The 3 diesel and 2 satellite dispenser liners all contained small amounts of accumulated liquid, and had anchored shear valves. There is still an active leak in Dispenser 11, which must be repaired. The hose on Dispenser 10 appears to still have an active leak from the nozzle, which must be repaired. The other diesel hoses were in good repair. | ||||||||||
| 02/24/2012 | Editable Letter Activity | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/24/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2012-02-24 NCL | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 02/22/2012 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Perform required repairs. | ||||||||||
| 02/22/2012 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/22/2012 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/22/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 02/22/2012 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 02/16/2012 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/24/2012 | Activity Closed By: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/24/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/22/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Inspection Date: 2/16/2012 By: bauer_dr Parties Present: Nick Patel This inspection covers one 4,000gal premium unleaded Modern Welding double walled, two (2) 10,000gal Titan (EQ-416) double walled (one regular unleaded and one diesel) USTs, 3 STP sumps, 3 double walled spill buckets and 7 dispensers w/liners. Release Detection: The release detection method for this facility is monthly visual inspection of the dispensers, spill buckets, and Submersible Turbine Pump (STP) sumps, and dispensing equipment. The interstitial spaces are checked manually. Physical Inspection Results: The piping is double wall Environ green flex. The tank interstice was manually checked for each tank and the diesel had 9 inches of water, the regular had 6 inches of water and the premium tank interstitial space was dry. See NOTES below. The STP sumps were damp with no accumulation. Mechanical line leak detectors were observed in all STP sumps; the test boots were opened and the sumps contained sensors however the sensors are not connected to the monitoring system. The regular spill was damp and the secondary was dry, the premium spill had 1 inch of product and there was product in the secondary that needs to be removed, the diesel spill had 1 inch of product and the secondary was dry. Straight drop tubes were observed; overfill protection is provided with ball check valves per registration. The dispenser sumps were dry except for #11 which had 1 inch of product and an active leak; all shear valves appeared tight. The dispenser hoses are in good condition with no leaks or cracks noted except for the diesel hose on 9/10 which had a leak (See NOTES). Records Available: The 2011-2012 Placard, the Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) (mailed to the facility), the proof of insurance (12/01/11 to 12/01/12, C&I), and the Certification of Financial Responsibility (CFR) were available. The monthly visual inspections were also available from 10/11/10 to 1/17/12, all within the 35 day limit except for the periods of 4/4/11 to 5/18/11, 5/18/11 to 6/28/11 and 9/26/11 to 11/1/11 and appeared to coincide with physical inspection observations. The monthly visual inspections are performed by 1st Choice. It was noted that they were unable to check the tank interstitial area on numerous logs. Test Results: Clemens Fuel Systems tested and passed the mechanical line leak detectors and EBW Monitoring system on 10/18/12. NOTE: 1. All liquid MUST be completely removed regular and diesel interstices and a breach of integrity test performed. An INF will need to be submitted to this office for the liquid in the tank interstice. ANY time there is liquid in the tank interstice it must be removed and a breach of integrity test performed and an INF submitted to this office 2. Remove the liquid in the premium spill bucket secondary and have a breach of integrity test performed. Submit the test results to this office. 3. Repair the leak in dispenser #11 (diesel) and contact this office to schedule a re-inspection. 4. Repair or replace the leaking diesel hose on dispenser #9/10. | ||||||||||
| 02/22/2012 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1010 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.450(2)(a)1., 62-761.450(2)(a)2., 62-761.450(2)(a)3., 62-761.450(2)(a)4., 62-761.450(2)(a)5., 62-761.450(2)(a)6., 62-761.450(2)(a)7. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Multiple incidents occurring at the same time at the facility may be reported on one form. #1-3 - Evidence of these types of INF situations are generally found during the inspector's paperwork review. Ask the facility representative what action they took in response, and in what time frame. If the situations are resolved within 24 hours, the owner/operator is not required to submit an INF to the local program. However, the actions they took to resolve the issue must be documented. #4-5, and 7 - Evidence of these types of situations are generally found during the outside or physical portion of the inspection. Give the facility owner/operator 24 hours to resolve, provided they document their actions. If they can not resolve the issues then they must submit the INF, at which time the two week investigative window opens. #6 - Evidence of this type of situation may be found during the physical examination of the release detection device (e.g. alarm mode), or during the examination of the records associated with the method. Note: Inspectors may find events that qualify as incidents during their review of the facility's paperwork. Such issues must have been resolved within 24 hours if an INF was not submitted at the time of the event. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_No INF has been received. Submit an INF for the water in the Diesel interstice. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation ongoing. Immediately complete and return the attached Incident Notification Form. | ||||||||||
| 02/22/2012 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1010 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.450(2)(a)1., 62-761.450(2)(a)2., 62-761.450(2)(a)3., 62-761.450(2)(a)4., 62-761.450(2)(a)5., 62-761.450(2)(a)6., 62-761.450(2)(a)7. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Multiple incidents occurring at the same time at the facility may be reported on one form. #1-3 - Evidence of these types of INF situations are generally found during the inspector's paperwork review. Ask the facility representative what action they took in response, and in what time frame. If the situations are resolved within 24 hours, the owner/operator is not required to submit an INF to the local program. However, the actions they took to resolve the issue must be documented. #4-5, and 7 - Evidence of these types of situations are generally found during the outside or physical portion of the inspection. Give the facility owner/operator 24 hours to resolve, provided they document their actions. If they can not resolve the issues then they must submit the INF, at which time the two week investigative window opens. #6 - Evidence of this type of situation may be found during the physical examination of the release detection device (e.g. alarm mode), or during the examination of the records associated with the method. Note: Inspectors may find events that qualify as incidents during their review of the facility's paperwork. Such issues must have been resolved within 24 hours if an INF was not submitted at the time of the event. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_No INF has been received. Submit an INF for the water in the Diesel interstice. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation ongoing. Immediately complete and return the attached Incident Notification Form. | ||||||||||
| 11/05/2010 | Editable Letter Activity | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 11/05/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 11/05/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2010-11-05 NCL | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 10/27/2010 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_Diesel interstice still continues to have water intrusion. The interstice contained 12 inches of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 10/27/2010 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 10/27/2010 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 10/27/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 10/27/2010 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 10/27/2010 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 11/05/2010 | Activity Closed By: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 11/05/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 11/01/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Inspection Date: 10/27/2010 By: bauer_dr Parties Present: Nick Patel This inspection covers one 4,000gal premium unleaded Modern Welding double walled, two (2) 10,000gal Titan (EQ-416) double walled (one regular unleaded and one diesel) USTs, 3 STP sumps, 3 double walled spill buckets and 7 dispensers w/liners. Release Detection - The release detection method for this facility is monthly visual inspection of the dispensers, spill buckets, and Submersible Turbine Pump (STP) sumps, and dispensing equipment. The tanks (Titan Tanks, EQ-416) interstitial spaces are checked manually. Physical Inspection Results - The piping is double wall Environ green flex. The tank interstice was manually checked for each tank and the diesel had 24 inches of water, the regular had 2 inches of water and the premium tank interstitial space was dry. See NOTES below. The diesel and regular STP sumps each had 1-2 inches of water and the premium STP sump was dry. Mechanical line leak detectors were observed in all STP sumps; the test boots were opened and the sumps contained sensors properly placed, but they are not the primary method of release detection and used only as a back-up. All spill buckets were clean and dry. The secondary space of the spill buckets appeared dry. Straight drop tubes were observed; overfill protection is provided with ball check valves per registration. The dispenser sumps were dry; all shear valves appeared tight. The dispenser hoses are in good condition with no leaks or cracks noted. NOTE: The lid to access the diesel tank interstice checkpoint was removed after considerable human effort and finally a large forklift. Records Available - The 2010-2011 Placard, the Release Detection Response Level (RDRL), the proof of insurance (12/01/09 to 12/01/10, C&I; they also had the renewal for the 2010-2011 year), and the Certification of Financial Responsibility (CFR) were available. The monthly visual inspections were also available from 10/14/09 to 9/09/10, all within the 35 day limit and appearing to coincide with physical inspection observations. The monthly visual inspections are performed by AET (1st Choice). It was noted that the lid to access the diesel tank interstice was stuck on at the last inspection. Test Results - Tanknology tested and passed the line leak detectors, double walled lines and double walled tanks on 3/11/2010 and Clemens tested and passed the mechanical line leak detectors on 10/12/10. NOTE: All liquid MUST be completely removed from the tank interstices and if they continue to show any liquid an INF will need to be filed and a tank tightness test performed on each tank. It is recommended that the tank interstices be pumped each day until no more liquid is found. | ||||||||||
| 10/27/2010 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 10/27/2010 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 10/27/2010 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_Diesel interstice still continues to have water intrusion. The interstice contained 12 inches of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 10/27/2010 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_Diesel interstice still continues to have water intrusion. The interstice contained 12 inches of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 03/29/2010 | Record Document Activity | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Nick Patel | Activity Closed Date: | 03/29/2010 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/29/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 02/12/2010 | Editable Letter Activity | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | County Subsequent Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 02/24/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Wed Feb 24 00:00:00 EST 2010 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/23/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 02/23/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2010-02-23 Second NCL | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 10/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1010 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.450(2)(a)1., 62-761.450(2)(a)2., 62-761.450(2)(a)3., 62-761.450(2)(a)4., 62-761.450(2)(a)5., 62-761.450(2)(a)6., 62-761.450(2)(a)7. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Multiple incidents occurring at the same time at the facility may be reported on one form. #1-3 - Evidence of these types of INF situations are generally found during the inspector's paperwork review. Ask the facility representative what action they took in response, and in what time frame. If the situations are resolved within 24 hours, the owner/operator is not required to submit an INF to the local program. However, the actions they took to resolve the issue must be documented. #4-5, and 7 - Evidence of these types of situations are generally found during the outside or physical portion of the inspection. Give the facility owner/operator 24 hours to resolve, provided they document their actions. If they can not resolve the issues then they must submit the INF, at which time the two week investigative window opens. #6 - Evidence of this type of situation may be found during the physical examination of the release detection device (e.g. alarm mode), or during the examination of the records associated with the method. Note: Inspectors may find events that qualify as incidents during their review of the facility's paperwork. Such issues must have been resolved within 24 hours if an INF was not submitted at the time of the event. | ||||||||||
| 10/22/2009 | Editable Letter Activity | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 10/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1066 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Visual monitoring or manual sampling: The idea is to visually inspect the interstice or inside containment area for product. Works well with piping sumps, dispenser liners, integral piping J ports, tanks with interstitial ports. Continuous electronic sensing equipment: Panel on the wall, probe in the interstice. Variety of probes: liquid (petroleum discriminating/ non discriminating), vapor, optical. Hydrostatic monitoring systems: Liquid level readings recorded monthly, or electronically monitored with an alarm. Vacuum monitoring: Vacuum readings recorded monthly, or equipped with a low vacuum alarm. | ||||||||||
| 10/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1059 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)2. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if release detection systems are not functioning or not maintained properly. The inspector will have to know what release detection components have been installed at the facility. Furthermore, develop a library of installation and system operation specifications. These documents will assist you in determining calibration/maintenance as required by the manufacturer. Additional guidance can be found in the Appendix sections of the USEPA "List of Leak Detection Evaluations for Underground Storage Tank Systems" and the DEP Master Equipment List. Installations - have the release detection components been function tested? Just because a piece of equipment is new out of the box does not mean it is fully functional. Have it demonstrated! Calibration/Maintenance - the facility must provide documentation attesting to these operability tests. Operation - The RDRL must be developed, and the facility personnel must be knowledgeable of all the components of the release detection system. Theoretically, they should be able to demonstrate to you how they monitor the release detection system. See rule 62-761.700(1)(c)3 | ||||||||||
| 10/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1058 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the release detection method is not able to register or detect a new release. If you feel that the release detection system has lost its ability to detect a new release, document why in the inspection report. Examples include: a. An automatic tank gauge system already in alarm mode will not be able to detect a new release; b. sumps with water/product may impair detection abilities; c. monitoring wells at contaminated sites may also have impaired ability to detect new releases. See .640(2)(c)2. for further guidance on using contaminated monitoring wells for release detection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_Diesel interstice contained 12 inches of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 11/03/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | According to the monthly inspection logs there is water found consistantly in the tank(s) interstice. The same was found during the annual compliance inspection on 10/27/2010. Even though the facility states that they are removing the liquid each month, the system is unable to detect a new release. This violation will remain open until the issue is corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 03/29/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 10/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1058 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the release detection method is not able to register or detect a new release. If you feel that the release detection system has lost its ability to detect a new release, document why in the inspection report. Examples include: a. An automatic tank gauge system already in alarm mode will not be able to detect a new release; b. sumps with water/product may impair detection abilities; c. monitoring wells at contaminated sites may also have impaired ability to detect new releases. See .640(2)(c)2. for further guidance on using contaminated monitoring wells for release detection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_Diesel interstice contained 12 inches of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 11/03/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | According to the monthly inspection logs there is water found consistantly in the tank(s) interstice. The same was found during the annual compliance inspection on 10/27/2010. Even though the facility states that they are removing the liquid each month, the system is unable to detect a new release. This violation will remain open until the issue is corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 03/29/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 10/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1058 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the release detection method is not able to register or detect a new release. If you feel that the release detection system has lost its ability to detect a new release, document why in the inspection report. Examples include: a. An automatic tank gauge system already in alarm mode will not be able to detect a new release; b. sumps with water/product may impair detection abilities; c. monitoring wells at contaminated sites may also have impaired ability to detect new releases. See .640(2)(c)2. for further guidance on using contaminated monitoring wells for release detection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_Diesel interstice contained 12 inches of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 11/03/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | According to the monthly inspection logs there is water found consistantly in the tank(s) interstice. The same was found during the annual compliance inspection on 10/27/2010. Even though the facility states that they are removing the liquid each month, the system is unable to detect a new release. This violation will remain open until the issue is corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 03/29/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 10/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1058 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the release detection method is not able to register or detect a new release. If you feel that the release detection system has lost its ability to detect a new release, document why in the inspection report. Examples include: a. An automatic tank gauge system already in alarm mode will not be able to detect a new release; b. sumps with water/product may impair detection abilities; c. monitoring wells at contaminated sites may also have impaired ability to detect new releases. See .640(2)(c)2. for further guidance on using contaminated monitoring wells for release detection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_Diesel interstice contained 12 inches of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 11/03/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | According to the monthly inspection logs there is water found consistantly in the tank(s) interstice. The same was found during the annual compliance inspection on 10/27/2010. Even though the facility states that they are removing the liquid each month, the system is unable to detect a new release. This violation will remain open until the issue is corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 03/29/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 10/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1058 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the release detection method is not able to register or detect a new release. If you feel that the release detection system has lost its ability to detect a new release, document why in the inspection report. Examples include: a. An automatic tank gauge system already in alarm mode will not be able to detect a new release; b. sumps with water/product may impair detection abilities; c. monitoring wells at contaminated sites may also have impaired ability to detect new releases. See .640(2)(c)2. for further guidance on using contaminated monitoring wells for release detection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/28/2014 | User: | JUARISTIC_GK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 21FEB2014.GKJ_Diesel interstice contained 12 inches of water at the time of inspection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 11/03/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | According to the monthly inspection logs there is water found consistantly in the tank(s) interstice. The same was found during the annual compliance inspection on 10/27/2010. Even though the facility states that they are removing the liquid each month, the system is unable to detect a new release. This violation will remain open until the issue is corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 03/29/2010 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/16/2012 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
| Description: | 5/15/12: Violation is ongoing. Breach of Integrity test passed on 3/7/12, yet liquid is still entering the interstice. The method of liquid entry must be corrected immediately and Breach of Integrity test results must be verified in the presence of an inspector. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/24/2012 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This violation will remain open as there is still liqiud being found in the tank interstice each month, so the problem has not yet been corrected. | ||||||||||
| 10/15/2009 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 10/15/2009 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 10/22/2009 | Activity Closed By: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/22/2009 | User: | BAUER_DR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Inspection Date: 10/15/2009 By: bauer_d Parties Present: Brad Wentworth from AET This inspection covers one 4,000gal unleaded DW, 1 10,000gal unleaded DW and one 10,000gal diesel DW USTs, 3 STP sumps, 3 DW spill buckets and 7 dispensers. Release Detection ¿ The release detection method for this facility is monthly visual inspection of the dispensers, spill buckets, and Submersible Turbine Pump (STP) sumps, and dispensing equipment. The tanks¿ (Titan Tanks, EQ-416) interstitial spaces are checked manually. The mechanical line leak detectors must be certified annually. The premium interstitial space has a liquid sensor installed but it doesn¿t work. AET was pulling a status tape for the premium tank. They will now manually check the interstice on all three tanks. In the past, two of the tanks had vacuum gauges installed but they have since been removed. Physical Inspection Results ¿ The piping is double wall Environ green flex. The tank interstice was manually checked for each tank and the diesel had 15¿ of liquid, the regular had 1¿ of liquid and the premium tank interstitial space contained approximately 22¿ of fluid. All three STP sumps were dry. Mechanical line leak detectors were observed in all STP sumps; the test boots were opened and the sumps contained sensors properly placed, but they are not the primary method of release detection and used only as a back-up. All spill buckets were clean and dry. The secondary space of the spill buckets appeared dry. Straight drop tubes were observed; overfill protection is provided with ball check valves per registration. The dispenser sumps were dry; all shear valves appeared tight. The dispenser hoses are in good condition with no leaks or cracks noted. Records Available ¿ The 2009-2010 Placard, the Release Detection Response Level (RDRL), the proof of insurance, and the Certification of Financial Responsibility (CFR) were available. The monthly visual inspections were also available from 10/20/08 to 09/13/09, all within the 35 day limit and appearing to coincide with physical inspection observations. Hy-Tech performed the inspections from 10/20/08 to 6/16/09. AET performed the inspections from 6/16/09 to present. AET was only using the liquid status printouts for the tank interstice and not manually checking them. No RD was performed during that timeframe. Test Results ¿ Hy-Tech Petroleum (RQ 66536) tested and passed the mechanical line leak detectors on 10/23/08. There was no record of the annual test of the vacuum gauges and no record of when they were removed. NOTE: All liquid MUST be removed from the tank interstices, an INF filed and a tank tightness test performed on each tank. In addition it is recommended that the AUTOSTIK monitoring panel be programmed properly to accurately reflect the current configuration. | ||||||||||
| 10/15/2009 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Bauer, David R. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 10/15/2009 | ||||||||||
| 04/17/2009 | Record Document Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Nick Patel | Activity Closed Date: | 04/17/2009 | ||||||||
| 04/16/2009 | Comment | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Description: | This facility consists of two (2) 10,000 gallon double walled Titan tanks EQ#317 and one (1) 4,000 gallon Modern Welding double walled steel with epoxy coating EQ#222, Advance Polymer Technologies APT double wall flex piping EQ#569, environ dispensers and sumps EQ#649 | ||||||||||
| 04/16/2009 | Record Document Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Nick Patel | Activity Closed Date: | 04/16/2009 | ||||||||
| 04/07/2009 | Record Document Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Nick Patel | Activity Closed Date: | 04/07/2009 | ||||||||
| 03/23/2009 | Editable Letter Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 10/21/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1032 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.500(5)(a) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Does not apply to aviation fuels, which have a different color scheme (see API Bulletin 1542 which is not a reference standard). Fillbox covers are to be labeled using one of the following methods: a. Painting or placing a decal on top of the cover and on the rim of the fillbox. b. Attaching a tag to the fill pipe adapter. c. Screwing a tag onto the fillbox rim. d. Fitting a plastic or fiberglass insert inside the rim of the fillbox. Refer to the color coded chart included in the API 1637 Reference Standard. | ||||||||||
| 10/21/2008 | Editable Letter Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 10/21/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1139 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.820(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Calculate if the facility owner/operator acted within this time frame. Request manifests to verify proper disposal. Record in the inspection report if the facility disposed of the regulated substance improperly. Note that secondary containment refers to interstices, liners (both dispenser and piping sump), as well as dike field containment. | ||||||||||
| 10/21/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1138 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.820(1)(a), 62-761.820(1)(b), 62-761.820(1)(c) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if an incident was not investigated, or not investigated properly. See rule 62-761.450(2) for incident reporting requirements. | ||||||||||
| 10/21/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| 10/21/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| 10/21/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1082 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(b), 62-761.640(1)(c) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the RDRL hasn't been written, or if the RDRL presented doesn't match the release detection methods used. Is reality different from their plan? Note that an SPCC or groundwater monitoring plan will suffice as an RDRL. See following sample form. RELEASE DETECTION RESPONSE LEVELS FACILITY NAME: ________________________________________ FACILITY #: ______________ In accordance with 62-761.600(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) the following Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) has been established for the checked method(s) of Release Detection: RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: One failed SIR report or two consecutive inconclusive SIR reports. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Continuous Automatic Tank Gauge System RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Automatic Tank Gauge System with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vacuum Monitoring RDRL: A sudden loss of vacuum or a 20% loss of the original vacuum. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Presence of free product or water. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Tank and Line Tightness Tests used with daily inventory reconciliation (available until 10 yrs. after last tank upgrade) RDRL: Failed tank and/or line tightness test, unexplained water fluctuations exceeding one inch; significant loss or gain. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Groundwater Monitoring Wells RDRL: Presence of free product or sheen. Discharge Report Form must be submitted within 24 hours. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vapor Monitoring Wells RDRL: Vapor concentrations >= 500 ppm for gasoline, Vapor concentrations >= 50 ppm for diesel RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Manual Tank Gauging (Only valid for tanks up to 2000 gals) RDRL: Readings exceeding the standards described in 62-761.640 Table MTG, F.A.C.. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Water above the entrance of double-wall piping or presence of free product. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Line Leak Detector RDRL: Tripping/Activation of leak detector. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Line Tightness Test RDRL: Failed tightness test As required by 62-761.200(71), F.A.C., if the RDRL is measured or observed, we will initiate activities to determine if an incident, release, or discharge has occurred. If within 24 hours we can not determine if a discharge occurred, an Incident Notification Form will be submitted | ||||||||||
| 10/21/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1058 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the release detection method is not able to register or detect a new release. If you feel that the release detection system has lost its ability to detect a new release, document why in the inspection report. Examples include: a. An automatic tank gauge system already in alarm mode will not be able to detect a new release; b. sumps with water/product may impair detection abilities; c. monitoring wells at contaminated sites may also have impaired ability to detect new releases. See .640(2)(c)2. for further guidance on using contaminated monitoring wells for release detection. | ||||||||||
| 10/21/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1040 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.500(8)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the shear valves are not properly installed or anchored. The shear valve should be anchored to the dispenser frame in the ground. The valve should stay in place if the dispenser is knocked over. This is not intended to be the emergency fuel shut off system, and the emergency fuel shut off system already in place can not take the place of a shear valve. NFPA 30A Section 4-3.6 states: Small diameter piping systems connected to the dispenser should have a rigidly anchored automatically shutoff shear valve installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. a. This valve should be at the base of each individual island type dispenser or at the inlet of each overhead dispensing device. b. This valve should incorporate a fusible link or other thermally activated device that will close the valve in the event of fire exposure. c. This valve should incorporate a mechanism to close the valve in the event of severe impact or displacement of the dispenser. d. The valve should be rigidly anchored so that the shear section functions as intended. An emergency shutoff valve incorporating a slip joint feature shall not be used. Note that NFPA 30A Section 4-3.6 suggests that shear valves be tested annually for functionality. However, Rule 761.500(8)(c)1 only requires installation standards to be met. You may recommend that the shear valves be tested annually but the Fire Marshall must enforce this. In an accident, as the dispenser is knocked over, these valves are intended to break and seal off the piping at the location of the valve to prevent a submersible pump from pumping out a geyser of fuel. It is both a fire hazard issue as well as environmental issue. | ||||||||||
| 10/20/2008 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 10/20/2008 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 10/21/2008 | Activity Closed By: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/21/2008 | User: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Description: | Release Detection ¿ The release detection method for this facility is monthly visual inspection of the dispensers, spill buckets, and Submersible Turbine Pump (STP) sumps, and dispensing equipment. The diesel and regular tanks¿ (Titan Tanks, EQ-416) interstitial spaces are monitored with a vacuum gauge; the premium tank interstitial space is checked manually. The mechanical line leak detectors and vacuum gauges must be certified annually. Physical Inspection Results ¿ The piping is double wall Environ green flex. The diesel and regular vacuum readings could not be accessed. The premium tank interstitial space was checked manually and it contained approximately 24¿ of fluid. All three STP sumps contained water at the piping level. Mechanical line leak detectors were observed in all STP sumps; the test boots were opened and the sumps contained sensors, however they are improperly placed, but they are not the primary method of release detection and used only as a back-up. All spill buckets were dirty and contained product. The secondary space of the spill buckets appeared as if they were moist and should be closely monitored. Straight drop tubes were observed; overfill protection is provided with ball check valves per registration. The dispenser sumps were dry; all shear valves appeared tight except for the shear valves in the #9/10 dispenser, which appears uncorrected from last year¿s inspection. Also the #1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hoses are very worn and apparently were not replaced from last years recommendation. The #9/10 swivel hose is leaking and must be replaced. The paint on the fill covers are very worn and need to be repainted. Hy-Tech Petroleum noted on the 04/18/2008 inspection that there was ¿water in the interstitial space¿. No INF or documentation was received as of inspection date of 10/16/2008. Records Available ¿ The 2007-2008 Placard, the Release Detection Response Level (RDRL), the proof of insurance, and the Certification of Financial Responsibility (CFR) were available. The monthly visual inspections were also available from 10/26/2007 to 09/26/2008, all within the 35 day limit and appearing to coincide with physical inspection observations. Test Results ¿Hy-Tech Petroleum (RQ 66536) tested and passed the mechanical line leak detectors on 10/23/07. There was no record of the annual test of the vacuum gauges. (The vacuum gauges were last tested on 10/11/06.) Please note that the actual inspection was conducted on 10/16/2008. | ||||||||||
| 04/28/2008 | TCAR Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Incomplete | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 04/28/2008 | ||||||||||
| 04/25/2008 | Discharge Reporting Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 04/22/2011 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/22/2011 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 04/25/2008 | Editable Letter Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Site Assessment Request | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 04/25/2008 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Fri Apr 25 15:52:45 EST 2008 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 04/25/2008 | User: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Description: | Editable Site Assessment Request Letter | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 04/25/2008 | Document Management Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Discharge Report Form | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/22/2011 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 04/30/2008 | User: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Description: | DRF - DIPU.8519617 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 02/20/2008 | Editable Letter Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 02/20/2008 | Editable Letter Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 02/08/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1025 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.500(2)(a) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Document deviation from all manufacturers' requirements. Obtain and review installation instructions. It is a good idea to accumulate a library of tank system specifications for either your office or yourself. | ||||||||||
| 02/08/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1135 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.800(3)(a)1., 62-761.800(3)(a)2., 62-761.800(3)(b)1., 62-761.800(3)(b)2., 62-761.800(3)(b)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Refer to .800(3)(b) for exemptions to a full closure assessment report. In cases of existing contamination, a limited summary closure report may be all that is required. The inspector needs to make a thorough examination of the system file history prior to the closure event. Research prior discharges, information on STCM and PCT. Check for the cleanup program disposition of all reported discharges. Look at any readily available CAR/SAR documents that show where contamination is present. If the local program performs plan reviews, this is a good time to discuss the extent of closure that will be required at the facility. See rules 62-761.800(3)(c) & 62-761.210(2)(e)1 for closure assessment requirements. | ||||||||||
| 02/07/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1006 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.450(1)(a)2. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | The local program should receive notice of listed tasks prior to the initiation of the work. Local program may accept less notice and still consider this item in compliance. This rule citation is not a requirement to submit construction plans. Notice can be accepted in these formats: Verbal Written Fax Email | ||||||||||
| 02/07/2008 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 02/07/2008 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/20/2008 | Activity Closed By: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/08/2008 | User: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Description: | Contractor: Hy-Tech Petroleum, Inc. (Julius Seles) P C C 050799 Phone (813) 267-2553 Environmentalist ¿ Michael Bateman (813)719-1596 Activity- Installation of two spill buckets EQ number and equipment description not provided. 01/14/2008- The contractor stated that the spill buckets would be vacuum tested. The inspector was not on site to witness this test. Testing was not conducted on this date. There was no environmentalist on site. Documentation of testing will be required. Discharge History- One discharge reported on 12/01/98. Early Detection Incentive-eligible; Score 95, active. Program site manager: Perlows, Robert (850) 245-8917 A 10 day and a 48 hr. notification for this closure activity were not submitted. There was no environmentalist on site. 02/06/2008 ¿ Hy-Tech and the station owner were both contacted to provide equipment information and testing data; both of which were not provided. The Department was not informed of the products or scope of work contracted for or performed. 02/06/2008 ¿ Michael Bateman in an email that a closure assessment and vacuum testing of the spill buckets will be done on 02/12/2008 | ||||||||||
| 02/07/2008 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 02/07/2008 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/20/2008 | Activity Closed By: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/07/2008 | User: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Description: | Contractor: Hy-Tech Petroleum, Inc. (Julius Seles) P C C 050799 Phone (813) 267-2553 Environmentalist ¿ Michael Bateman (813)719-1596 Activity- Removal of two spill buckets. Discharge History- One discharge reported on 12/01/98. Early Detection Incentive-eligible; Score 95, active. Program site manager: Perlows, Robert (850) 245-8917 1/2/08- A 10 day and a 48 hr. notification for this closure activity was not submitted. There was no environmentalist on site. 02/06/2008 ¿ Hy-Tech and the station owner were both contacted to provide equipment information and testing data; both of which were not provided. The Department was not informed of the products or scope of work contracted for or performed. 02/06/2008 ¿ Michael Bateman in an email that a closure assessment and vacuum testing of the spill buckets will be done on 02/12/2008 | ||||||||||
| 02/07/2008 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1007 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.450(1)(a)3.a., 62-761.450(1)(a)3.b. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | A good working relationship with the PSSC contractors should minimize scheduling problems. Notice can be accepted in these formats: Verbal Written Fax Email | ||||||||||
| 10/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| 10/30/2007 | Editable Letter Activity | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 10/30/2007 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 10/30/2007 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 10/30/2007 | Activity Closed By: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/30/2007 | User: | MARTIN_JM | ||||||||
| Description: | Release Detection ¿ The release detection method for this facility is monthly visual inspection of the dispensers, spill buckets, and Submersible Turbine Pump (STP) sumps, and dispensing equipment. The diesel and regular tanks¿ (Titan Tanks, EQ-416) interstitial spaces are monitored with a vacuum gauge; the premium tank interstitial space is checked manually. The mechanical line leak detectors and vacuum gauges must be certified annually. Physical Inspection Results ¿ The piping is double wall Environ green flex. The diesel and regular vacuum readings were 15¿ Hg. The premium tank interstitial space was checked manually and it was dry. The diesel STP sump was dry; the premium and regular STP sumps contained water below the piping level. Mechanical line leak detectors were observed in all STP sumps; the test boots were opened and the sumps contained sensors, but they are not the primary method of release detection and used only as a back-up. The spill buckets were dry. The diesel spill bucket has a crack at the bottom and will need to be replaced; a hydro test was performed at the time of inspection and it failed. Straight drop tubes were observed; overfill protection is provided with ball check valves per registration. The dispenser sumps were dry; all shear valves appeared tight except for the #9/10 dispenser. The #1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hoses are showing signs of wear and should be replaced soon. Records Available ¿ The 2007-2008 Placard, the Release Detection Response Level (RDRL), the proof of insurance, and the Certification of Financial Responsibility (CFR) were available. (The RDRL and CFR were filled out during the inspection.) The monthly visual inspections were also available from 10/11/06 to 9/28/07 and appeared to coincide with physical inspection observations. One period exceeded the 35 day time limit (3/21/07 to 4/28 07). Test Results ¿Hy-Tech Petroleum (RQ 66536) tested and passed the mechanical line leak detectors on 10/23/07. There was no record of the annual test of the vacuum gauges. (The mechanical line leak detectors and vacuum gauges were tested on 10/11/06.) Remark- Please schedule your monthly visual inspection so they do not exceed the 35 day time limit. Recommendations- The #1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hoses are showing signs of wear and should be replaced soon. Please note that the actual inspection was conducted on 10/25/2007. | ||||||||||
| 10/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Martin, John Michael | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| 02/15/2007 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/15/2007 | ||||||||||
| 09/21/2006 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 09/21/2006 | ||||||||||
| 09/13/2006 | Violation Closed | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
| 09/13/2006 | Editable Letter Activity | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | District Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 09/13/2006 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Wed Sep 13 00:00:00 EST 2006 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 09/13/2006 | User: | RODRIGUEZ_IN | ||||||||
| Description: | NCL Report | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 09/13/2006 | Violation Closed | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1082 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(b), 62-761.640(1)(c) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the RDRL hasn't been written, or if the RDRL presented doesn't match the release detection methods used. Is reality different from their plan? Note that an SPCC or groundwater monitoring plan will suffice as an RDRL. See following sample form. RELEASE DETECTION RESPONSE LEVELS FACILITY NAME: ________________________________________ FACILITY #: ______________ In accordance with 62-761.600(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) the following Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) has been established for the checked method(s) of Release Detection: RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: One failed SIR report or two consecutive inconclusive SIR reports. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Continuous Automatic Tank Gauge System RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Automatic Tank Gauge System with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vacuum Monitoring RDRL: A sudden loss of vacuum or a 20% loss of the original vacuum. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Presence of free product or water. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Tank and Line Tightness Tests used with daily inventory reconciliation (available until 10 yrs. after last tank upgrade) RDRL: Failed tank and/or line tightness test, unexplained water fluctuations exceeding one inch; significant loss or gain. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Groundwater Monitoring Wells RDRL: Presence of free product or sheen. Discharge Report Form must be submitted within 24 hours. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vapor Monitoring Wells RDRL: Vapor concentrations >= 500 ppm for gasoline, Vapor concentrations >= 50 ppm for diesel RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Manual Tank Gauging (Only valid for tanks up to 2000 gals) RDRL: Readings exceeding the standards described in 62-761.640 Table MTG, F.A.C.. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Water above the entrance of double-wall piping or presence of free product. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Line Leak Detector RDRL: Tripping/Activation of leak detector. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Line Tightness Test RDRL: Failed tightness test As required by 62-761.200(71), F.A.C., if the RDRL is measured or observed, we will initiate activities to determine if an incident, release, or discharge has occurred. If within 24 hours we can not determine if a discharge occurred, an Incident Notification Form will be submitted | ||||||||||
| 09/13/2006 | Violation Closed | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
| 09/13/2006 | Violation Closed | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| 09/12/2006 | Attachment | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| 09/12/2006 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 09/12/2006 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 09/13/2006 | Activity Closed By: | RODRIGUEZ_IN | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 09/13/2006 | User: | RODRIGUEZ_IN | ||||||||
| Description: | Release Detection ¿ Interstitial monitoring of the diesel and regular unleaded tanks is check by vacuum gauges (Titan EQ-416), the premium unleaded tank is check with a dry stick and the piping is by visual inspection as the dispensers and spill buckets, and annual certification of the mechanical line leak detectors. Physical Inspection Results ¿ The piping to the gasoline dispensers is APT light blue flexible double wall piping. The piping to the diesel dispensers is Environ green flexible double wall piping. The diesel and regular tanks¿ interstitial space is monitored via vacuum gauges. The diesel and regular tank were reading 14 and 15 inches mercury respectively, which agrees with the monthly visual inspection notes. These readings above do not exceed the 20% of the initial level of 17¿ and 18¿ hq respectively however the vacuum gauges have not been tested for operability during year 2005. The premium tank is monitored manually with a stick (it was checked dry). The regular STP sump, the diesel and the premium STP sumps were dry. The spill buckets were dry at the time of inspection; straight drop tubes were observed. The dispenser sumps were dry at the time of inspection; there were no apparent leaks or damage observed at the dispenser hoses and/or connections. Records Available ¿ The Placard (2006-2007), and monthly visual inspections (11/09/05 to 08/08/06) were available. Hy- Tech Environmental performs the monthly visual inspection for the facility. The Certificate of Financial Responsibility (CFR) and the proof of insurance were available at the time of inspection. The Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) form was not available for this inspection. Test Results ¿ Hy-Tech Environmental tested and passed 3 mechanical leak detectors on 6/4/2003 however there were no test results available for 2004, 2005. The annual testing of the 3 mechanical leak detectors (MLD) still due since 6/4/04 and be aware that the 2006 MLD testing was be due in June. There was no documentation available to proof that an annual operability test was conducted for the vacuum gauges at the diesel and the regular unleaded tanks for years 2004 and 2005 and also this current year 2006 had been conducted. There were no test results available for the 3 mechanical leak detectors for 2004 and 2005. Also vacuum gauges testing results for the diesel and the regular unleaded tanks are not available. Please submit the proper documentation to this Department within 14 days of receipt of this letter. Remarks: This Department is seriously considering referring this facility to the Department of Environmental Protection for possible enforcement actions due to the repetition of these violations. The violations found during this inspection were also found during the 2004 and 2005 inspections. | ||||||||||
| 09/12/2006 | Attachment | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| 03/13/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: PERLOWSKI_R, SITE MANAGER Email: Robert.Perlowski@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 03/13/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11703332 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8519617 ON 02/21/2006 BY RODRIGUEZ, IVAN. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 03/13/2006 USER: IVAN RODRIGUEZ OF PASCO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 03/13/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: PERLOWSKI_R, SITE MANAGER Email: Robert.Perlowski@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 03/13/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11703332 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8519617 ON 02/21/2006 BY RODRIGUEZ, IVAN. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 03/13/2006 USER: IVAN RODRIGUEZ OF PASCO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 03/13/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: PERLOWSKI_R, SITE MANAGER Email: Robert.Perlowski@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 03/13/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11703332 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8519617 ON 02/21/2006 BY RODRIGUEZ, IVAN. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 03/13/2006 USER: IVAN RODRIGUEZ OF PASCO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 03/13/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: PERLOWSKI_R, SITE MANAGER Email: Robert.Perlowski@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 03/13/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11703332 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8519617 ON 02/21/2006 BY RODRIGUEZ, IVAN. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 03/13/2006 USER: IVAN RODRIGUEZ OF PASCO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 03/13/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: PERLOWSKI_R, SITE MANAGER Email: Robert.Perlowski@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 03/13/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11703332 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8519617 ON 02/21/2006 BY RODRIGUEZ, IVAN. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 03/13/2006 USER: IVAN RODRIGUEZ OF PASCO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 03/13/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: PERLOWSKI_R, SITE MANAGER Email: Robert.Perlowski@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 03/13/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11703332 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8519617 ON 02/21/2006 BY RODRIGUEZ, IVAN. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 03/13/2006 USER: IVAN RODRIGUEZ OF PASCO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 03/13/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: PERLOWSKI_R, SITE MANAGER Email: Robert.Perlowski@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 03/13/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11703332 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8519617 ON 02/21/2006 BY RODRIGUEZ, IVAN. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 03/13/2006 USER: IVAN RODRIGUEZ OF PASCO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 03/13/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: PERLOWSKI_R, SITE MANAGER Email: Robert.Perlowski@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 03/13/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11703332 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8519617 ON 02/21/2006 BY RODRIGUEZ, IVAN. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 03/13/2006 USER: IVAN RODRIGUEZ OF PASCO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 03/13/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: PERLOWSKI_R, SITE MANAGER Email: Robert.Perlowski@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 03/13/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11703332 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8519617 ON 02/21/2006 BY RODRIGUEZ, IVAN. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 03/13/2006 USER: IVAN RODRIGUEZ OF PASCO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 02/21/2006 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/22/2012 | User: | DOLAN_J | ||||||||
| Description: | Equipment used on site:20,000 gallon F/G clad Steel UST-Manufacturer Metal Products-Model Glassteel II-EQ # 156; 2-12,000 gallon F/G clad Steel UST-Manufacturer Metal Products-Model Glassteel II-EQ# 156;2" FRP Pipe-Manufacturer-Smith Fiberglass-Model 1103-069-2-EQ# 252; 3" FRP Pipe-Manufacturer-Smith Fiberglass-Model 1103-069-3-EQ# 252; F/G Tank Sump-Manufacturer Petroleum Containment-Model PC4560U-3CO; Dispenser Sump-Manufacturer Petroleum Containment-CLE174375; 5 gallon Overspill Bucket-Manufacturer Emco Wheaton-Model EW-A1004-211A-EQ#695; 15 gallon Overspill Bucket-Manufacturer Emco Wheaton-Model EW-A1004-EVR-215S-EQ#695;Overfill Protection /Ball Float-Manufacture OPW-Model 30MV-3120-EQ#223; Tank Monitor-Manufacturer Veeder-Root-Model 84290-22-EQ#197; Leak Detection/PLLD-Manufacturer Veeder-Root-Model 848480-001-EQ#271; Interstitial Sensor-Manufacturer Veeder-Root-Model 794390-420-EQ#614. | ||||||||||
| 02/21/2006 | Legacy Activity | Rodriguez, Ivan | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 02/21/2006 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| 02/21/2006 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/22/2012 | User: | DOLAN_J | ||||||||
| Description: | Equipment used on site:20,000 gallon F/G clad Steel UST-Manufacturer Metal Products-Model Glassteel II-EQ # 156; 2-12,000 gallon F/G clad Steel UST-Manufacturer Metal Products-Model Glassteel II-EQ# 156;2" FRP Pipe-Manufacturer-Smith Fiberglass-Model 1103-069-2-EQ# 252; 3" FRP Pipe-Manufacturer-Smith Fiberglass-Model 1103-069-3-EQ# 252; F/G Tank Sump-Manufacturer Petroleum Containment-Model PC4560U-3CO; Dispenser Sump-Manufacturer Petroleum Containment-CLE174375; 5 gallon Overspill Bucket-Manufacturer Emco Wheaton-Model EW-A1004-211A-EQ#695; 15 gallon Overspill Bucket-Manufacturer Emco Wheaton-Model EW-A1004-EVR-215S-EQ#695;Overfill Protection /Ball Float-Manufacture OPW-Model 30MV-3120-EQ#223; Tank Monitor-Manufacturer Veeder-Root-Model 84290-22-EQ#197; Leak Detection/PLLD-Manufacturer Veeder-Root-Model 848480-001-EQ#271; Interstitial Sensor-Manufacturer Veeder-Root-Model 794390-420-EQ#614. | ||||||||||
| 05/24/2005 | Legacy Activity | Condoleon, George John | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/16/2005 | Legacy Activity | Condoleon, George John | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/10/2005 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1010 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.450(2)(a)1., 62-761.450(2)(a)2., 62-761.450(2)(a)3., 62-761.450(2)(a)4., 62-761.450(2)(a)5., 62-761.450(2)(a)6., 62-761.450(2)(a)7. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Multiple incidents occurring at the same time at the facility may be reported on one form. #1-3 - Evidence of these types of INF situations are generally found during the inspector's paperwork review. Ask the facility representative what action they took in response, and in what time frame. If the situations are resolved within 24 hours, the owner/operator is not required to submit an INF to the local program. However, the actions they took to resolve the issue must be documented. #4-5, and 7 - Evidence of these types of situations are generally found during the outside or physical portion of the inspection. Give the facility owner/operator 24 hours to resolve, provided they document their actions. If they can not resolve the issues then they must submit the INF, at which time the two week investigative window opens. #6 - Evidence of this type of situation may be found during the physical examination of the release detection device (e.g. alarm mode), or during the examination of the records associated with the method. Note: Inspectors may find events that qualify as incidents during their review of the facility's paperwork. Such issues must have been resolved within 24 hours if an INF was not submitted at the time of the event. | ||||||||||
| 05/10/2005 | Legacy Activity | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/10/2005 | Violation Closed | Condoleon, George John | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 761.700(1)(c)1 | ||||||||||
| 05/10/2005 | Violation Closed | Condoleon, George John | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 761.600(1)(a)1 | ||||||||||
| 05/10/2005 | Violation Closed | Condoleon, George John | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 761.400(3) | ||||||||||
| 05/10/2005 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/04/2018 | User: | WINKLER_MG_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | EQ- 191 | ||||||||||
| 05/10/2005 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
| 03/31/2004 | Violation Closed | Condoleon, George John | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(a)1 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/25/2011 | User: | CASSELS_CR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | (CSX Tank #T14) Off-road diesel for locomotives. SW horizontal round painted steel tank with built in steel risers mounted onto concrete supports within a sealed concrete secondary containment with three other tanks #3, 4 & 9. Secondary Containment measured during 3/20/96 inspection to be 157,625 gallon volume. File records do not state tank manufacturer. Tank is manifolded to Tank #9. Piping is all aboveground Bulk SW painted steel, exiting bottom of tank and leads to a transfer pump house adjacent to the containment area, making it gravity fed/suction out of the tank and then pressurized from the pump to the service area across the road and adjacent to the railroad tracks where there are several tee connections leading to Snyder bulk delivery nozzles. There is an isolation valve installed at point of exit from tank; anti-siphon valve not required on bulk piping. Remote tight fill port has spill containment at the unloading area; fill line enters top of tank. The unloading area drains to the oil/water separator. Overfill Protection is the secondary containment; however, tanks also installed with Morrison 918 Clock Gauges (EQ-527) with Morrison 918S audible alarm panels and continuous remotely monitored Milltronics Multiranger ultrasonic high level gauges & alarms (EQ-406). | ||||||||||
| 03/31/2004 | Legacy Activity | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK COMPLIANCE RE-INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 02/02/2004 | Violation Closed | Condoleon, George John | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(a)1 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/18/2007 | User: | SNIPES_SR_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | TANK #6: 551 GALLON SINGLE WALL STEEL AST LOCATED INSIDE COATED CONCRETE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AREA WITH 110% CAPACITY FOR THE LARGEST TANK. SINGLE WALL STEEL ABOVEGROUND PIPING WITH NO CONTACT TO THE SOIL. ISOLATION VALVE. FILL ON TOP OF TANK. RELEASE DETECTION- MONTHLY VISUAL INSPECTIONS | ||||||||||
| 02/02/2004 | Legacy Activity | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 03/27/2003 | Violation Closed | Hansen, David W. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 400(2)(a)6 | ||||||||||
| 03/27/2003 | Legacy Activity | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 03/27/2003 | Violation Closed | Hansen, David W. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(c)1 | ||||||||||
| 03/27/2003 | Violation Closed | Hansen, David W. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(a)1 | ||||||||||
| 06/24/2002 | Legacy Activity | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK INSTALLATION - FINAL INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/31/2002 | Legacy Activity | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 04/24/2001 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK COMPLIANCE RE-INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 04/11/2001 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 04/10/2001 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 640(3)(a)3 | ||||||||||
| 04/10/2001 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK COMPLIANCE RE-INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 03/15/2001 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 03/12/2001 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(c)1 | ||||||||||
| 03/12/2001 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 03/12/2001 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(a)1 | ||||||||||
| 03/12/2001 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 640(3)(a)3 | ||||||||||
| 07/03/2000 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK COMPLIANCE RE-INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/10/2000 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/08/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 500(2)(d)1 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 11/01/2022 | User: | GLENNON_BM_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2022-10-20 Site Photo | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 11/01/2022 | User: | GLENNON_BM_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2022-10-20 Tank Pad | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 10/26/2022 | User: | GLENNON_BM_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2022-10-22 Site Map | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 05/08/2000 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK COMPLIANCE RE-INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/08/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 800(4)(d) | ||||||||||
| 05/08/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 800(4)(a)&(b) | ||||||||||
| 05/08/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 640(3)(a)3 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/06/2025 | User: | LEWIS_DL_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Site sketch/photos reviewed. | ||||||||||
| 03/29/2000 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 03/24/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 400(3) | ||||||||||
| 03/24/2000 | Legacy Activity | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 03/24/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 500(2)(d)1 | ||||||||||
| 03/24/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 04/09/2019 | User: | PERRY_JF_2 | ||||||||
| Description: | Facility contact is the Senior Facility Director at mark.schmidl@holidaytouch.com and cell is 971-718-6824. | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 04/09/2019 | User: | PERRY_JF_2 | ||||||||
| Description: | Facility Layout drawing | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 04/09/2019 | User: | PERRY_JF_2 | ||||||||
| Description: | Gen/Set system | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 03/24/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 640(1)(c) | ||||||||||
| 03/24/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 640(3)(a)3 | ||||||||||
| 03/24/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 710(2) | ||||||||||
| 03/24/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 800(4)(a)&(b) | ||||||||||
| 03/24/2000 | Violation Closed | Harris, Danny L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 800(4)(d) | ||||||||||
| 02/23/1999 | Legacy Activity | Peterson, Jan E. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK INSTALLATION - FINAL INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||