![]() |
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bob Martinez Center 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 |
Storage Tanks & Contamination Monitoring Information |
|||||||||
Journal Report | |||||||||||
Report Run Date: 04/30/2025 Last Data Refresh: 04/29/2025 Report Generated from DOPPLER | |||||||||||
Facility ID: | 8520625 | ||||||||||
Facility Name: | SUNCOAST FOOD STORE | ||||||||||
03/22/2024 | Violation Open | Puhr, Nicholas M | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 6072 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(3), 62-761.700(3)(a), 62-761.700(3)(a)1, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.a, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.b, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.c, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.d, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.e, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.f, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.g, 62-761.700(3)(a)2 | ||||||||||
03/22/2024 | Editable Letter Activity | Puhr, Nicholas M | |||||||||
Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/22/2024 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 03/22/2024 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 03/22/2024 | User: | PUHR_NM_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 3/22/2024 CAO Letter | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
03/22/2024 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Puhr, Nicholas M | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 03/08/2024 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/22/2024 | Activity Closed By: | PUHR_NM_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/22/2024 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
03/22/2024 | Violation Open | Puhr, Nicholas M | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 6001 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.100(3) | ||||||||||
03/22/2024 | Violation Open | Puhr, Nicholas M | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 6013 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.420(3), 62-761.420(4), 62-761.420(8) | ||||||||||
03/22/2024 | Violation Open | Puhr, Nicholas M | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 6073 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(3)(b), 62-761.700(3)(b)1, 62-761.700(3)(b)2 | ||||||||||
08/30/2021 | Editable Letter Activity | Brownlee, Sarah M | |||||||||
Activity Title: | Warning Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/31/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity/Document has been approved | Date: | 08/30/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Approved by Hannah Westervelt: approved. | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 08/30/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 08/30/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Submitted for approval by: Sarah M Brownlee | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 08/30/2021 | User: | BROWNLEE_S | ||||||||
Description: | Warning Letter (WL21-134TK52SWD) | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
08/18/2021 | Enforcement Tracking Activity | Brownlee, Sarah M | |||||||||
Activity Status: | Open | ||||||||||
08/17/2021 | Enforcement Referral Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Accepted | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 08/18/2021 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/18/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity/Document was acknowledged on this date | Date: | 08/17/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Acknowledged and Assigned by Hannah Westervelt | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been assigned | Date: | 08/17/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Assigned to Sarah M Brownlee | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 08/17/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Submitted for approval by: Nathan J Colson: Referral for SNC-A Violation - No current storage tank registration placard for In Service UST system. | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity/Document was accepted on this date | Date: | 08/18/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Accepted by Sarah M Brownlee: Accepted | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 08/17/2021 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Referral for SNC-A Violation - No current storage tank registration placard for In Service UST system. | ||||||||||
08/12/2021 | Violation Open | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 6053 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.500(7)(c), 62-761.500(7)(c)1, 62-761.500(7)(c)2, 62-761.500(7)(d) | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 03/22/2024 | User: | PUHR_NM_1 | ||||||||
Description: | As of the inspection on 3/8/24, no tests results were made available for review. | ||||||||||
08/12/2021 | Editable Letter Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 08/12/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/12/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 08/12/2021 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 08/12/2021 NCL | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
08/12/2021 | Violation Open | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 6062 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(4) | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 03/22/2024 | User: | PUHR_NM_1 | ||||||||
Description: | As of the inspection on 3/8/24, no tests results were made available for review. | ||||||||||
08/12/2021 | Violation Open | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | SNC-A | Status: | Open | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 6007 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.400(7), 62-761.400(7)(a), 62-761.400(7)(b) | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 03/22/2024 | User: | PUHR_NM_1 | ||||||||
Description: | All fees have been paid and the current 2023-2024 placard was observed during this inspection. | ||||||||||
08/12/2021 | Violation Open | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 6072 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(3), 62-761.700(3)(a), 62-761.700(3)(a)1, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.a, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.b, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.c, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.d, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.e, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.f, 62-761.700(3)(a)1.g, 62-761.700(3)(a)2 | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 03/22/2024 | User: | PUHR_NM_1 | ||||||||
Description: | As of the inspection on 3/8/24, no tests results were made available for review. | ||||||||||
07/29/2021 | Attachment | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
07/29/2021 | Electronic Communication Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 07/29/2021 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Date: | 07/29/2021 | ||||||||||
Recipient: | Nathan Colson | ||||||||||
Sender: | Gazi Rahman | ||||||||||
Subject: | Re: 8520625 Tank Inspection - July 21 | ||||||||||
Message: | See comment & attachment | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/29/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 07/29/2021 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Spoke to Gazi on the phone (813-766-1784) regarding the inspection time. | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 07/29/2021 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Emails scheduling routine inspection | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
07/29/2021 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 07/21/2021 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 08/12/2021 | Activity Closed By: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/12/2021 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
07/07/2020 | Editable Letter Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Title: | Return to Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 07/07/2020 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/07/2020 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 07/07/2020 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 07/07/2020 RTC Letter | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
07/06/2020 | Record Document Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
Contact Name: | Gazi Rahman & Kevin Ledlie | Activity Closed Date: | 07/07/2020 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/07/2020 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/07/2020 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
08/28/2019 | Violation Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 4076 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(3), 62-761.700(3)(a), 62-761.700(3)(a)1., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.d., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.e., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.f., 62-761.700(3)(a)2. | ||||||||||
08/28/2019 | Editable Letter Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/28/2019 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 08/28/2019 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 08/28/2019 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 08/28/2019 CAO Letter | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
08/28/2019 | Violation Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 4057 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.500(7)(e) | ||||||||||
08/28/2019 | Violation Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 4081 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.710(4) | ||||||||||
08/28/2019 | Violation Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 4076 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(3), 62-761.700(3)(a), 62-761.700(3)(a)1., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.d., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.e., 62-761.700(3)(a)1.f., 62-761.700(3)(a)2. | ||||||||||
08/06/2019 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 08/06/2019 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 08/28/2019 | Activity Closed By: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/28/2019 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
07/17/2019 | Electronic Communication Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 07/17/2019 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Date: | 07/17/2019 | ||||||||||
Recipient: | Gazi Rahman and majlishnik@gmail.com | ||||||||||
Sender: | Nathan Colson | ||||||||||
Subject: | RE: Routine Storage Tank Inspection | ||||||||||
Message: | see attachment & comment | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/17/2019 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 07/17/2019 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | On 07/17/2019, attempted to call the facility in order to confirm the routine inspection date. Both registered numbers are invalid. So far, no response to email either. | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 07/17/2019 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Emails scheduling routine compliance inspection | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
12/19/2017 | Electronic Communication Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 12/19/2017 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Date: | 12/19/2017 | ||||||||||
Recipient: | Nathan Colson | ||||||||||
Sender: | Gazi Rahman | ||||||||||
Subject: | Re: 8520625 Suncoast Food Store | ||||||||||
Message: | I checked, but I forgot to mark the form. When the store will reopen, check overfill tubes, remove ball, check and test leak detectors. | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 12/19/2017 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
03/23/2017 | Attachment | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
03/23/2017 | Editable Letter Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 03/23/2017 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/23/2017 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 03/23/2017 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | NCL 03/23/2017 | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
03/23/2017 | Violation Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
03/10/2017 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 03/10/2017 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/23/2017 | Activity Closed By: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/23/2017 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
02/27/2017 | Phone Conversation Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Call Type: | Outgoing | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Phone Number: | (813) 766-1784 | Activity Closed Date: | 02/27/2017 | ||||||||
Subject: | Called again & left a message for Gazi. He called the Mid-County EH office & they patched him through to me. We scheduled a routine compliance inspection for 03/10/2017. We discussed the need for two years of records and the previous inspection results. Told him about the Inspection Prep Videos online. | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/27/2017 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
02/17/2015 | Editable Letter Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Description: | CAO | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 02/17/2015 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent on Tue Feb 17 00:00:00 EST 2015 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/17/2015 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 02/17/2015 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | NCL 02/17/2015 | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
02/13/2015 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 02/13/2015 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/13/2015 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
02/11/2015 | Violation Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1063 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(e) | ||||||||||
Comments: | The electronic monitoring unit is a system consisting of a sensor, wiring, and a panel. The sensor and the component that it monitors are exempt from the visual inspection process. However, the proper operation of the remainder of the electronic system must be verified on a monthly basis. One way to test is to activate the panel alarm switch. Depending on the system in place this test may check the alarm light, alarm horn, or the circuit continuity between the panel and the remote sensor. This test procedure must be documented by the facility, as required in rule 62-761.710(2). The remote verification feature meets this requirement, such as the Veeder-Root Simplicity system. | ||||||||||
02/11/2015 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Colson, Nathan J | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 02/11/2015 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 02/17/2015 | Activity Closed By: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/17/2015 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 02/17/2015 | User: | COLSON_NJ_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Inspection Date: 02/11/2015 By: Nathan Colson Parties Present: Gazi Rahman Inspection Covers: 15000 gal. compartmented (Reg/Prem), double walled UST. Placard: on display Dates: 2014 to 2015 Release Detection Response Level: Left a copy on site. *Be sure to keep this form on site for the lifetime of the storage tank system. Certificate of Financial Responsibility: Filled out during this inspection. *Be sure to fill out a new CoFR every year when the insurance policy renews. Commerce & Industry 05/25/2014 to 05/25/2015 Also observed the Commerce & Industry policy for 05/25/2013 to 05/25/2014. Registration Codes Accurate: Emailed Registration to correct the spelling of the Facility city. Site Plan Accurate: Ok _____________________________________________________________________ Release Detection Method: Monthly visuals of the spill buckets, STP sumps, dispenser liners, & the tank interstice. Dates Checked: 04/09/2013 to 01/27/2015 Results: The condition of the spill buckets was not checked off on the logs for 03/19/2014, 04/18/2014, 05/20/2014, or 06/15/2014. Inspections exceeded 35 days from 12/20/2014 to 01/27/2015. *Be sure to perform & properly document release detection inspections every month & no more than 35 days apart. _____________________________________________________________________ Tests: Type: Date Tested: Results: Next Date Due: Leak Detectors 10/16/2013 Pass Leak Detectors *12/17/2014 Pass 12/17/2015 Breach of Integrity 04/15/2013 Pass 04/15/2018 (Tank Interstice - Every 5 Years) Tested By: Precision Petroleum, Inc. *Annual testing was due by 10/16/2014, but not performed until 12/17/2014. Be sure to have annual tests performed within 12 months of the last test date. _____________________________________________________________________ Fills Marked per API 1637: yes Overfill Prevention: Flow Shutoff valves. (Coaxial drop tubes) Spill Bucket Condition: ( 2 total) Emco Wheaton. Clean & dry. No cracks observed. STP/Pipe Transition Sump: ( 2 total) Petroleum Containment, Inc., fiberglass. Equipped with FE Petro STPs & FE Petro MLLDs. Clean & dry. Piping: Double walled, pressurized, APT flex. DW Pipe Interstice Open: In the STP sumps. Dispenser Liners: ( 2 total) APT, poly. 1/2 was clean & dry. 3/4 was damp only. Shear Valves Anchored Properly: yes Dispenser Hose Condition: Good. No leaks observed. Tank Interstice: Dry. Manually stuck during this inspection. | ||||||||||
04/16/2013 | Record Document Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
Contact Name: | Gazi Rahman, owner | Activity Closed Date: | 04/16/2013 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/16/2013 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
04/16/2013 | Issue Document Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
Contact Name: | Gazi Rahman, owner | Activity Closed Date: | 04/16/2013 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/16/2013 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
04/10/2013 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | In Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 04/10/2013 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 04/16/2013 | Activity Closed By: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/16/2013 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
03/23/2012 | TCAR Activity | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
03/23/2012 | Editable Letter Activity | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Activity Title: | Closure Assessment Report (Complete) | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent on Fri Mar 23 00:00:00 EDT 2012 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 03/23/2012 | User: | SOWERS_JA_1 | ||||||||
Description: | PinCHD Review Letter | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
01/23/2012 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 01/11/2012 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 01/23/2012 | Activity Closed By: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/23/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 01/23/2012 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Received on 1/23/2012 post-construction line and leak detector test results for both Premium and Regular lines performed by Precision on 1/12/2012. The certified contractor must submit an "Underground Storage System Installation and Removal Form for Certified Contractors" to this office within 30 days. | ||||||||||
01/23/2012 | Editable Letter Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 01/23/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent on Mon Jan 23 00:00:00 EST 2012 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/23/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 01/23/2012 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | NCL 1.23.12 | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
01/19/2012 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 01/11/2012 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 01/19/2012 | Activity Closed By: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/19/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
01/19/2012 | Editable Letter Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 01/19/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent on Thu Jan 19 00:00:00 EST 2012 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/19/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 01/19/2012 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | NCL 1.19.12 | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
12/20/2011 | Editable Letter Activity | Meetze, Alison | |||||||||
Activity Title: | District Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 12/20/2011 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent on Tue Dec 20 00:00:00 EST 2011 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 12/20/2011 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 12/20/2011 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
Description: | Suncoast Food Store NCL | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
12/06/2011 | Violation Closed | Meetze, Alison | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1138 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.820(1)(a), 62-761.820(1)(b), 62-761.820(1)(c) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if an incident was not investigated, or not investigated properly. See rule 62-761.450(2) for incident reporting requirements. | ||||||||||
12/06/2011 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Meetze, Alison | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 12/06/2011 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 12/20/2011 | Activity Closed By: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 12/20/2011 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/06/2011 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
Description: | Inspection performed 12/6/11 by Alison Meetze and Steve Jarrett. Gazi Rahman arrived at end of inspection. The facility consists of 1 double-walled, compartmented UST with 2 sumps, 2 spill buckets, and 2 dispenser liners. Records Review: The Financial Responsibility, Release Detection records, and registration placard were available for review. The annual testing was provided by fax on 12/9/11; results are attached to inspection in FIRST. A CoFR and RDRL were left at the facility at the time of the inspection. Physical Inspection: The spill buckets were clean and dry; they are labeled, but beginning to fade. The top of the regular-grade spill bucket is bent, photo was taken. Overfill prevention is provided by flow shut-off valves. The piping sumps were both clean and dry with the double-walled piping open to the sumps. Both sumps have a crack in the bottom; a photo was taken of the regular-grade sump only as the premium-sump was documented in the 11/2/11 compliance inspection. The dispenser liners were clean and mostly dry; 3/4 has a small amount of old product, but there was no evidence of an active leak. The hoses are all showing signs of wear, with Dispenser 3 hose being the worst. The interstice was manually gauged during the inspection and found to be dry. | ||||||||||
11/15/2011 | Incident Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Has not led to Discharge | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/27/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 12/27/2011 phone conversation with Kevin Ledlie, Precision Petroleum - he plans to replace both STP sumps next week with FRP sumps - will send a scope of work to Ernest Roggelin today or tomorrow | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 03/23/2012 | User: | SOWERS_JA_1 | ||||||||
Description: | JAS March 23, 2012 - Sump Closure Report submitted and indicates that no reportable release occurred related to cracked sumps. | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 11/15/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Phone conversation with Kevin Ledlie of Precision Petroleum on 11/14/2011 - he is aware that there is also a crack in the bottom of the Regular STP sump, as well as the Premium and will be quoting the owner for replacing both sumps. He also related in a phone conversation on 11/9 that he will have a consultant doing investigation sampling when the sumps are replaced. | ||||||||||
11/15/2011 | Incident Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Has not led to Discharge | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/27/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 12/27/2011 phone conversation with Kevin Ledlie, Precision Petroleum - he plans to replace both STP sumps next week with FRP sumps - will send a scope of work to Ernest Roggelin today or tomorrow | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 03/23/2012 | User: | SOWERS_JA_1 | ||||||||
Description: | JAS March 23, 2012 - Sump Closure Report submitted and indicates that no reportable release occurred related to cracked sumps. | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 11/15/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Phone conversation with Kevin Ledlie of Precision Petroleum on 11/14/2011 - he is aware that there is also a crack in the bottom of the Regular STP sump, as well as the Premium and will be quoting the owner for replacing both sumps. He also related in a phone conversation on 11/9 that he will have a consultant doing investigation sampling when the sumps are replaced. | ||||||||||
11/15/2011 | Incident Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Has not led to Discharge | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 03/23/2012 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/27/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 12/27/2011 phone conversation with Kevin Ledlie, Precision Petroleum - he plans to replace both STP sumps next week with FRP sumps - will send a scope of work to Ernest Roggelin today or tomorrow | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 03/23/2012 | User: | SOWERS_JA_1 | ||||||||
Description: | JAS March 23, 2012 - Sump Closure Report submitted and indicates that no reportable release occurred related to cracked sumps. | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 11/15/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Phone conversation with Kevin Ledlie of Precision Petroleum on 11/14/2011 - he is aware that there is also a crack in the bottom of the Regular STP sump, as well as the Premium and will be quoting the owner for replacing both sumps. He also related in a phone conversation on 11/9 that he will have a consultant doing investigation sampling when the sumps are replaced. | ||||||||||
11/03/2011 | Editable Letter Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 11/03/2011 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 11/03/2011 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent on Thu Nov 03 00:00:00 EDT 2011 | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 11/03/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | NCL 11.3.11 | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/20/2011 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
Description: | 12/6/11: Violation ongoing. Split in bottom of both piping sumps. | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 11/02/2011 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 11/03/2011 | Activity Closed By: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 11/03/2011 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 11/02/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 2011nov02_rhs Annual inspection, Mohammad Ahmed clerk present Emco-Wheaton SW spills, clean, covers marked; coax drop tubes with flow shut-offs APT poly STP sumps; FE Petro mech line leak detectors; APT DW flex piping with test boots pushed back; both sumps clean & dry; Premium unleaded sump has a split on the bottom about 12" long extending from the STP riser towards the outer wall of the sump at the SSE position - need INF filed and investigation, repair as necessary; Regular sump OK APT poly dispenser liners - both dry; Hose #3 cover deteriorated, others OK; shear valves anchored Manual stick of tank interstice - dry Current line leak detector function test results not available Modern Welding Glasteel II tank installed May 2004, current BOI test results not available 2011-2012 placard is posted | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 11/03/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 2011nov03_rhs Received signed Incident Notification Form for split in Premium sump - advised owner, Gazi Rahman, that he must submit report on investigation and resolution of incident within 14 days | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 11/02/2011 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 11/03/2011 | Activity Closed By: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 11/03/2011 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 11/02/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 2011nov02_rhs Annual inspection, Mohammad Ahmed clerk present Emco-Wheaton SW spills, clean, covers marked; coax drop tubes with flow shut-offs APT poly STP sumps; FE Petro mech line leak detectors; APT DW flex piping with test boots pushed back; both sumps clean & dry; Premium unleaded sump has a split on the bottom about 12" long extending from the STP riser towards the outer wall of the sump at the SSE position - need INF filed and investigation, repair as necessary; Regular sump OK APT poly dispenser liners - both dry; Hose #3 cover deteriorated, others OK; shear valves anchored Manual stick of tank interstice - dry Current line leak detector function test results not available Modern Welding Glasteel II tank installed May 2004, current BOI test results not available 2011-2012 placard is posted | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 11/03/2011 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 2011nov03_rhs Received signed Incident Notification Form for split in Premium sump - advised owner, Gazi Rahman, that he must submit report on investigation and resolution of incident within 14 days | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/20/2011 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
Description: | 12/6/11: Violation ongoing. | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1016 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.500(1)(d)1.a., 62-761.500(1)(d)1.c., 62-761.500(1)(d)1.d., 62-761.500(1)(d)2. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this out of compliance if any secondary containment system installed or maintained does not meet these standards. Installed secondary containment systems meet criteria specified in both DEP Equipment Approval and manufacturer's specifications. Request information from contractor, especially concerning manufacturer's specifications. | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/20/2011 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
Description: | 12/6/11: Violation ongoing. Split in bottom of both piping sumps. | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1122 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.710(1) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Was reasonable access to the facility granted? If not, document the circumstances. Were the records available within the specified time frame? If five day pre-inspection notice was not given by the inspector, this item can not be marked as a discrepancy. Make note of the missing documents, and arrange a review period. | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/20/2011 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
Description: | 12/6/11: Violation ongoing. Ensure all records are available for review during scheduled inspections. | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/20/2011 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
Description: | 12/6/11: Violation ongoing. Ensure all records are available for review during scheduled inspections. | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1020 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.500(1)(d)5. | ||||||||||
Comments: | The breach of integrity test is intended for closed interstices only. A closed interstice has no unsecured or unsealed opening to the outside. Double-walled piping without a boot connector, or if the boot has a bleed valve (for tightness testing), is considered an open interstice. The breach of integrity test may be performed by using at least one of the following methods: a. A continuous hydrostatic system b. A continuous vacuum system c. Testing of the interstice for liquid tightness in accordance with manufacturer's installation instructions; or d. Another method in accordance with subsection 62-761.850(2). How the breach of integrity test is performed or to what degree can depend on the depth to groundwater at each facility. When the tank and or piping are fully submerged, the lack of water intrusion into the secondary containment may be considered a verification of its integrity. However, when total submersion is not the case, one of the rule stipulated options must be used. The breach of integrity test should not be confused with a precision tightness test, which tests the primary tank or piping only. The breach of integrity test will test the secondary and primary shells, but is not a precision test. | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 12/20/2011 | User: | MEETZE_A | ||||||||
Description: | 12/6/11: Violation ongoing. | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
11/02/2011 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1059 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)2. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if release detection systems are not functioning or not maintained properly. The inspector will have to know what release detection components have been installed at the facility. Furthermore, develop a library of installation and system operation specifications. These documents will assist you in determining calibration/maintenance as required by the manufacturer. Additional guidance can be found in the Appendix sections of the USEPA "List of Leak Detection Evaluations for Underground Storage Tank Systems" and the DEP Master Equipment List. Installations - have the release detection components been function tested? Just because a piece of equipment is new out of the box does not mean it is fully functional. Have it demonstrated! Calibration/Maintenance - the facility must provide documentation attesting to these operability tests. Operation - The RDRL must be developed, and the facility personnel must be knowledgeable of all the components of the release detection system. Theoretically, they should be able to demonstrate to you how they monitor the release detection system. See rule 62-761.700(1)(c)3 | ||||||||||
04/14/2011 | Record Document Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
Contact Name: | Gazi Rahman, owner | Activity Closed Date: | 04/14/2011 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 04/14/2011 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
09/24/2010 | Editable Letter Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 09/24/2010 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent on Fri Sep 24 00:00:00 EDT 2010 | ||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 09/24/2010 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 09/24/2010 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | NCL 9.24.10 | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
09/22/2010 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
09/22/2010 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 09/21/2010 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 09/24/2010 | Activity Closed By: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 09/24/2010 | ||||||||
Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 09/22/2010 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 2010sep21_rhs Annual inspection with Gazi Rahman Fills marked, SW spill buckets OK; coax drop tubes with flow shut-off overfill APT poly STP sumps, FE Petro line leak detectors, APT DW flex piping with boots loosened; both sumps clean, dry Manual stick of tank interstice - dry APT poly dispenser liners - both dry; shears anchored; hoses OK 10-11 placard posted | ||||||||||
09/22/2010 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
09/22/2010 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1059 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)2. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if release detection systems are not functioning or not maintained properly. The inspector will have to know what release detection components have been installed at the facility. Furthermore, develop a library of installation and system operation specifications. These documents will assist you in determining calibration/maintenance as required by the manufacturer. Additional guidance can be found in the Appendix sections of the USEPA "List of Leak Detection Evaluations for Underground Storage Tank Systems" and the DEP Master Equipment List. Installations - have the release detection components been function tested? Just because a piece of equipment is new out of the box does not mean it is fully functional. Have it demonstrated! Calibration/Maintenance - the facility must provide documentation attesting to these operability tests. Operation - The RDRL must be developed, and the facility personnel must be knowledgeable of all the components of the release detection system. Theoretically, they should be able to demonstrate to you how they monitor the release detection system. See rule 62-761.700(1)(c)3 | ||||||||||
09/22/2010 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1122 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.710(1) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Was reasonable access to the facility granted? If not, document the circumstances. Were the records available within the specified time frame? If five day pre-inspection notice was not given by the inspector, this item can not be marked as a discrepancy. Make note of the missing documents, and arrange a review period. | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 11/15/2023 | User: | KHAN_MR_1 | ||||||||
Description: | TANK: 710 Gallon, Double-walled, Sub-Base, Tramont Corporation AST with Fill/Spill Containment (EQ-662) containing diesel fuel suppling fuel to an emergency generator. SPILL/FILL CONTAINMENT: 5 Gallon, Steel, spill box container equipped from the factory and included with the Tank EQ (EQ-662) OVERFILL: Tramont Manufacturing, Remote Alarm Fill Panel (EQ-662) and Madison Company, 90% High Level Sensor (EQ-682). RELEASE DETECTION: Madison Company, M7000, Single Point, Vertical Interstitial Switch (EQ-682). | ||||||||||
09/22/2010 | Violation Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
10/21/2009 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 10/21/2009 | ||||||||||
10/20/2009 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Result: | In Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 10/20/2009 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 10/21/2009 | Activity Closed By: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 10/20/2009 | User: | STRAUSS_RH_1 | ||||||||
Description: | 2009oct20_rhs Annual inspection with Gazi Rahman, owner RECORD REVIEW Commerce & Industry 5.25.09-5.25.10 w/ COFR Monthly visual inspections with manual stick of tank interstice 3.21.09-9.21.09 - no problems noted 09-10 placard is posted Mech line leak detector test by Precision Petroleum 3.10.09 PHYSICAL INSPECTION Fills marked, SW spill buckets dry, coax drop tubes with flow shut-offs APT poly STP sumps with FE Petro MLLDs and APT DW flex piping with boots pulled back - both sumps clean and dry APT poly dispenser liners, shear valves anchored, hoses OK; small amount of dried/varnished product residue in bottom of #3/4, other liner clean/dry Manual stick of tank interstice - dry | ||||||||||
04/17/2009 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Barnett, James | |||||||||
Activity Result: | In Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 04/17/2009 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 04/17/2009 | Activity Closed By: | BARNETT_JX | ||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 04/17/2009 | User: | BARNETT_JX | ||||||||
Description: | Re-inspected on 4.17.09. JB Dispenser hose has been replaced. | ||||||||||
03/27/2009 | Violation Closed | Barnett, James | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
03/27/2009 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Barnett, James | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/27/2009 | ||||||||||
03/27/2009 | Editable Letter Activity | Barnett, James | |||||||||
Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
03/27/2009 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Barnett, James | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 03/27/2009 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/27/2009 | Activity Closed By: | BARNETT_JX | ||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 03/27/2009 | User: | BARNETT_JX | ||||||||
Description: | Inspected on 3.27.09. JB -2008-2009 Placard.-ok -RDRL.-ok -FR: Commerce & Industry + CoFR 5/25/08-5/25/09.-ok -Monthly visual inspection records including tank interstice, dispensers, STP sumps. 3/08-3/09.-ok -APT sumps clean and dry during inspection. DW APT flex pipe.-ok -Spill containment clean and dry. Coax fills with flow shut off.-ok -Dispenser liners clean and dry. Shear valves properly anchored.-ok -Tank interstice dry during inspection.-ok -Dispenser hose #3 was cracked and damaged at time of inspection. Please replace damaged dispenser hose. | ||||||||||
03/21/2008 | Attachment | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
03/21/2008 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/21/2008 | ||||||||||
03/21/2008 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Activity Result: | In Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 03/21/2008 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 03/21/2008 | Activity Closed By: | LONGEN_JL_1 | ||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 03/21/2008 | User: | LONGEN_JL_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Placard ok. RDRL ok FR & CoFR ok. 5-25-07 to 5-25-08, C&I Monthly visual inspection records reviewed from 5-25-07 to 3-21-08. Visual inspection includes: spill buckets, dispensers, STP sumps and manually sticking tank interstice Test Results: At inspection on 3-21-08 with Gazi (notice 3-10-08) Fills: Coax fills with flappers, marked, ok. Spill buckets clean and dry. STP sumps: APT sumps. DW APT flex, FE Petro MLLD, ok. Tank interstice dipped, clean and dry. Dispensers: Shears, hoses and liners, ok. | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Attachment | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
05/16/2007 | Editable Letter Activity | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Activity Title: | District Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||
Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 05/16/2007 | ||||||||
Comment: | Sent on Wed May 16 00:00:00 EST 2007 | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 06/14/2007 | User: | LONGEN_JL_1 | ||||||||
Description: | After a discussion with Kevin from Precision Petroleum, who was on-site to make requested corrections, it was determined that the Schrader valve violations had been added in error. While the Schrader valve is very clearly closed, it also is very clearly pulled back from the piping area at which the outer wall terminates. Therefore, I am closeing all violations pertaining to this issue. | ||||||||||
Attachments: | |||||||||||
Attachment Date: | 05/16/2007 | User: | LONGEN_JL_1 | ||||||||
Description: | NCL Report | ||||||||||
View Attachment | |||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
On-Site Start Date: | 05/16/2007 | ||||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 05/16/2007 | Activity Closed By: | LONGEN_JL_1 | ||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 05/16/2007 | User: | LONGEN_JL_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Placard ok. RDRL not available FR ok, 5-25-06 to 5-25-07, C & I. CoFR not available. Monthly visual inspection records reviewed from 9-25-05 to 4-25-07, ok Visual inspection includes: fill, sumps, dispensers, manual checking if interstitial space. Test records reviewed: none available Repair records reviewed: 5-15-07: Precision Petroleum "Installed overfill tube" EMCO A1100-066. At inspection: Fills: Coax tight fills with flappers, marked, ok. Spill containment clean and dry. Sumps: FE Petro MLLD, flex piping. RUL sump piping schrader valve not open. Violation written on last TCI, not corrected. Dispensers: Shears, hoses and liners ok. Schrader valves all open. | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1082 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(b), 62-761.640(1)(c) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the RDRL hasn't been written, or if the RDRL presented doesn't match the release detection methods used. Is reality different from their plan? Note that an SPCC or groundwater monitoring plan will suffice as an RDRL. See following sample form. RELEASE DETECTION RESPONSE LEVELS FACILITY NAME: ________________________________________ FACILITY #: ______________ In accordance with 62-761.600(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) the following Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) has been established for the checked method(s) of Release Detection: RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: One failed SIR report or two consecutive inconclusive SIR reports. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Continuous Automatic Tank Gauge System RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Automatic Tank Gauge System with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vacuum Monitoring RDRL: A sudden loss of vacuum or a 20% loss of the original vacuum. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Presence of free product or water. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Tank and Line Tightness Tests used with daily inventory reconciliation (available until 10 yrs. after last tank upgrade) RDRL: Failed tank and/or line tightness test, unexplained water fluctuations exceeding one inch; significant loss or gain. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Groundwater Monitoring Wells RDRL: Presence of free product or sheen. Discharge Report Form must be submitted within 24 hours. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vapor Monitoring Wells RDRL: Vapor concentrations >= 500 ppm for gasoline, Vapor concentrations >= 50 ppm for diesel RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Manual Tank Gauging (Only valid for tanks up to 2000 gals) RDRL: Readings exceeding the standards described in 62-761.640 Table MTG, F.A.C.. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Water above the entrance of double-wall piping or presence of free product. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Line Leak Detector RDRL: Tripping/Activation of leak detector. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Line Tightness Test RDRL: Failed tightness test As required by 62-761.200(71), F.A.C., if the RDRL is measured or observed, we will initiate activities to determine if an incident, release, or discharge has occurred. If within 24 hours we can not determine if a discharge occurred, an Incident Notification Form will be submitted | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1059 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)2. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if release detection systems are not functioning or not maintained properly. The inspector will have to know what release detection components have been installed at the facility. Furthermore, develop a library of installation and system operation specifications. These documents will assist you in determining calibration/maintenance as required by the manufacturer. Additional guidance can be found in the Appendix sections of the USEPA "List of Leak Detection Evaluations for Underground Storage Tank Systems" and the DEP Master Equipment List. Installations - have the release detection components been function tested? Just because a piece of equipment is new out of the box does not mean it is fully functional. Have it demonstrated! Calibration/Maintenance - the facility must provide documentation attesting to these operability tests. Operation - The RDRL must be developed, and the facility personnel must be knowledgeable of all the components of the release detection system. Theoretically, they should be able to demonstrate to you how they monitor the release detection system. See rule 62-761.700(1)(c)3 | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1122 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.710(1) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Was reasonable access to the facility granted? If not, document the circumstances. Were the records available within the specified time frame? If five day pre-inspection notice was not given by the inspector, this item can not be marked as a discrepancy. Make note of the missing documents, and arrange a review period. | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1091 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.640(2)(e) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Note repair issues in rule 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)2, 62-761.700(1)(a)3, 62-761.700(1)(a)4, 62-761.700(1)(a)5 & 62-761.700(1)(a)6. Also note record keeping problems in rules 62-761.710(1) & 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1062 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1058 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(a)1. | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the release detection method is not able to register or detect a new release. If you feel that the release detection system has lost its ability to detect a new release, document why in the inspection report. Examples include: a. An automatic tank gauge system already in alarm mode will not be able to detect a new release; b. sumps with water/product may impair detection abilities; c. monitoring wells at contaminated sites may also have impaired ability to detect new releases. See .640(2)(c)2. for further guidance on using contaminated monitoring wells for release detection. | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1061 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(c) | ||||||||||
Comments: | At the time of the completion of the installation inspection, does the facility have an approved and appropriate release detection method for all the applicable portions of the system? | ||||||||||
05/16/2007 | Violation Closed | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1025 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.500(2)(a) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Document deviation from all manufacturers' requirements. Obtain and review installation instructions. It is a good idea to accumulate a library of tank system specifications for either your office or yourself. | ||||||||||
02/13/2007 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Longen, Julie L. | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 02/13/2007 | ||||||||||
09/20/2006 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Activity Closed Date: | 09/20/2006 | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 07/06/2006 | User: | SOWERS_JA_1 | ||||||||
Description: | PLLD electronic - EQ#271 | ||||||||||
10/03/2005 | Legacy Activity | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Activity Name: | RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Completion Notes: | TANK INSTALLED 5/04 PER STCM - FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY SUBMITTED IS FOR 5/05 TO 5/06 - L FRAZIER WILL CONTACT TO SEE IF THERE WAS F R FOR 5/04 TO 5/05 | ||||||||||
09/07/2005 | Legacy Activity | Roggelin, Ernest M. | |||||||||
Activity Name: | RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Completion Notes: | GAZI RAHMAN, OWNER. CELL #813-766-1784 OR STORE# 727-345-4369; STATUS LETTER | ||||||||||
09/06/2005 | Legacy Activity | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Activity Name: | RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
08/28/2005 | Legacy Activity | Roggelin, Ernest M. | |||||||||
Activity Name: | NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Rule: | 761.400(3) | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 02/09/2012 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Tank #1R1 and 2R1 - 15,000 GL. Modern Welding, Double Wall, Underground Storage Tanks(EQ 156). new system approved 12/02/2006. Piping - OPW, Double Wall Piping (EQ 648). Release detection is two (2) TLS Interstice Sensors (EQ-614) and TLS Single-Float Sump Sensors (EQ-614) in each Dispenser and STP Sump. All sensors are monitored by a Veeder Root TLS-350 PC (EQ-033). Each STP is equipped with a FE Petro Mechanical Line Leak Detector (EQ-335). All OPW Pisces Dispenser Sumps (EQ-368) and all OPW Pisces STP Sumps (EQ-318) are visually inspected monthly. The sheer valves and brackets were checked and found properly tightened and secure. The Veeder Root TLS-350 PC Automatic Tank Gauge shows all sensors normal and all functions normal. The Placard, Financial Responsibility, Release Detection Response Level, System Tests, Monthly Visual and Monthly Electronic Inspections are up-to-date and available for inspection. Overfill Protection - Ball Check Valves/Veeder Root TLS 350 Overfill Alarm. | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1082 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(b), 62-761.640(1)(c) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the RDRL hasn't been written, or if the RDRL presented doesn't match the release detection methods used. Is reality different from their plan? Note that an SPCC or groundwater monitoring plan will suffice as an RDRL. See following sample form. RELEASE DETECTION RESPONSE LEVELS FACILITY NAME: ________________________________________ FACILITY #: ______________ In accordance with 62-761.600(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) the following Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) has been established for the checked method(s) of Release Detection: RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: One failed SIR report or two consecutive inconclusive SIR reports. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Continuous Automatic Tank Gauge System RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Automatic Tank Gauge System with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vacuum Monitoring RDRL: A sudden loss of vacuum or a 20% loss of the original vacuum. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Presence of free product or water. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Tank and Line Tightness Tests used with daily inventory reconciliation (available until 10 yrs. after last tank upgrade) RDRL: Failed tank and/or line tightness test, unexplained water fluctuations exceeding one inch; significant loss or gain. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Groundwater Monitoring Wells RDRL: Presence of free product or sheen. Discharge Report Form must be submitted within 24 hours. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vapor Monitoring Wells RDRL: Vapor concentrations >= 500 ppm for gasoline, Vapor concentrations >= 50 ppm for diesel RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Manual Tank Gauging (Only valid for tanks up to 2000 gals) RDRL: Readings exceeding the standards described in 62-761.640 Table MTG, F.A.C.. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Water above the entrance of double-wall piping or presence of free product. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Line Leak Detector RDRL: Tripping/Activation of leak detector. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Line Tightness Test RDRL: Failed tightness test As required by 62-761.200(71), F.A.C., if the RDRL is measured or observed, we will initiate activities to determine if an incident, release, or discharge has occurred. If within 24 hours we can not determine if a discharge occurred, an Incident Notification Form will be submitted | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1061 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(c) | ||||||||||
Comments: | At the time of the completion of the installation inspection, does the facility have an approved and appropriate release detection method for all the applicable portions of the system? | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Rule: | 761.600(1)(e) | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Rule: | 761.640(4)(a) | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Rule: | 761.700(1)(c)3 | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Rule: | 761.400(3) | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Rule: | 761.710(2) | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Sowers, Joseph A. | |||||||||
Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Rule: | 761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1007 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.450(1)(a)3.a., 62-761.450(1)(a)3.b. | ||||||||||
Comments: | A good working relationship with the PSSC contractors should minimize scheduling problems. Notice can be accepted in these formats: Verbal Written Fax Email | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 11/26/2007 | User: | TISSINGTON_AB_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Modern Welding ACT 100 tanks 15,000 gal EQ # 156 compartmented APT Double wall piping EQ # 569 OPW Pisces Sumps and Liners EQ # 368 Opw 1C-2100 spill bucket (double wall) EQ # 224 FE Petro MLLD EQ # 335 Veederoot TLS 350 ATG EQ # 033 | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1025 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.500(2)(a) | ||||||||||
Comments: | Document deviation from all manufacturers' requirements. Obtain and review installation instructions. It is a good idea to accumulate a library of tank system specifications for either your office or yourself. | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
Comment Date: | 02/09/2012 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
Description: | Tank #1R1 and 2R1 - 15,000 GL. Modern Welding, Double Wall, Underground Storage Tanks(EQ 156). new system approved 12/02/2006. Piping - OPW, Double Wall Piping (EQ 648). Release detection is two (2) TLS Interstice Sensors (EQ-614) and TLS Single-Float Sump Sensors (EQ-614) in each Dispenser and STP Sump. All sensors are monitored by a Veeder Root TLS-350 PC (EQ-033). Each STP is equipped with a FE Petro Mechanical Line Leak Detector (EQ-335). All OPW Pisces Dispenser Sumps (EQ-368) and all OPW Pisces STP Sumps (EQ-318) are visually inspected monthly. The sheer valves and brackets were checked and found properly tightened and secure. The Veeder Root TLS-350 PC Automatic Tank Gauge shows all sensors normal and all functions normal. The Placard, Financial Responsibility, Release Detection Response Level, System Tests, Monthly Visual and Monthly Electronic Inspections are up-to-date and available for inspection. Overfill Protection - Ball Check Valves/Veeder Root TLS 350 Overfill Alarm. | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
Criteria ID: | 1021 | ||||||||||
Rule: | 62-761.500(1)(d)6. | ||||||||||
Comments: | All liquids must drain to a collection point. | ||||||||||
08/22/2005 | Legacy Activity | Roggelin, Ernest M. | |||||||||
Activity Name: | TANK INSTALLATION - FINAL INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
08/22/2005 | Legacy Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
08/22/2005 | Legacy Activity | Strauss, Randall | |||||||||
Activity Name: | NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||