|
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bob Martinez Center 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 |
Storage Tanks & Contamination Monitoring Information |
|||||||||
| Journal Report | |||||||||||
| Report Run Date: 04/29/2025 Last Data Refresh: 04/28/2025 Report Generated from DOPPLER | |||||||||||
| Facility ID: | 8520880 | ||||||||||
| Facility Name: | 2829 ARCADIA INC | ||||||||||
| 12/19/2024 | Enforcement Tracking Activity | Snyder, Ryan B | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Open | ||||||||||
| 08/02/2023 | Electronic Communication Activity | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 08/02/2023 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Date: | 08/02/2023 | ||||||||||
| Recipient: | Jeff Parks | ||||||||||
| Sender: |
Mohammed Hossain |
||||||||||
| Subject: | [EXTERNAL] 2829 highway 70 arcadia fl 34266 | ||||||||||
| Message: | Insurance Policy | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/02/2023 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 08/02/2023 | User: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Description: | Insurance Policy | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 08/02/2023 | Editable Letter Activity | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/08/2023 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 08/02/2023 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 08/02/2023 | User: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Description: | Referral Letter | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 07/27/2023 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 07/11/2023 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 08/08/2023 | Activity Closed By: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/08/2023 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 07/27/2023 | User: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Description: | TANKS: Inspected: Two (2) 12,000-gallon regular/premium double-walled, underground tanks to supply fuel dispensers. Tank interstitial: monitored via Veeder-Root TLS 350. Sensors: reading normal at time of inspection. SPILL CONTAINMENT: - Two (2) double-walled (DW) spill containment bucket(s) with dipstick to verify the interstitial, and a drain valve. OVERFILL PROTECTION: – Equipped with an overfill prevention valve flapper in the drop tubes. The vents are present and observed to be in satisfactory condition. The fill ports are marked/color coded per API RP 1637. PIPING/SUMPS: Double-walled, fiberglass piping with a line leak detector and isolation valve. Secondary piping is open to the sump. Water more than one inch in depth or any regulated substances collected in secondary containment shall be removed within 72 hours of discovery and properly disposed. DISPENSERS CONTAINMENT: Five (5) dispensers with containment observed in satisfactory condition. No evidence of cracking or product/liquid observed during the inspection. HOSES/NOZZLES: The hoses and nozzles appear to be in satisfactory condition. RELEASE DETECTION: The piping and tank interstices are continuously monitored via Veeder-Root TLS 350 equipped with visual and audible alarm. The visual and audible alarm panels were checked and found to be functioning properly. The Placard expiration date is: June 30, 2024. Storage tank registration fees are due to the Department each year by July 1. Ensure that your contact information is up-to-date with the Department in order to receive updates concerning your annual registration fees. Once fees are paid, you must print a copy of your placard from the Department's website: http://www.fldepportal.com/go/submit-registration/. Financial Responsibility must be maintained until your ASTs have been properly closed and your Closure Report/Limited Closure Report Form has been submitted to and approved by the Department. Records must be kept for three years. RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR THREE YEARS IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 62-761.710, F.A.C. Inspection Report sent by e-mail to: salinarabi@yahoo.com | ||||||||||
| 07/27/2023 | Editable Letter Activity | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | Compliance Assistance Offer Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/08/2023 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 08/02/2023 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 08/02/2023 | User: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Description: | referral letter | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 07/27/2023 | Phone Conversation Activity | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Call Type: | Outgoing | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Phone Number: | (863) 993-1147 | Activity Closed Date: | 08/08/2023 | ||||||||
| Subject: | Inspection Scheduling | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 08/08/2023 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Violation Open | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Open | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6073 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(3)(b), 62-761.700(3)(b)1, 62-761.700(3)(b)2 | ||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Phone Conversation Activity | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Call Type: | Outgoing | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Phone Number: | (863) 993-1147 | Activity Closed Date: | 05/17/2022 | ||||||||
| Subject: | J. Parks called to schedule the inspection. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/17/2022 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Enforcement Referral Activity | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Accepted | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 12/19/2024 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 05/17/2022 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Submitted for approval by: Jeff S Parks: Referred for enforcement for no CFR > 180 days | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was accepted on this date | Date: | 12/19/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Accepted by Ryan B Snyder: a | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 12/19/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was acknowledged on this date | Date: | 11/14/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Acknowledged and Assigned by Ryan B Snyder | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been assigned | Date: | 11/14/2024 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Assigned to Ryan B Snyder | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/17/2022 | User: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Description: | Referred for enforcement for no CFR > 180 days | ||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Editable Letter Activity | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 05/17/2022 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/17/2022 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 05/17/2022 | User: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Description: | Memo | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Violation Open | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Open | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6057 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(f), 62-761.600(1)(f)1 | ||||||||||
| 05/17/2022 | Violation Open | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-A | Status: | Open | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 6012 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.420(2) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/02/2023 | User: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Description: | The facility did not provide a valid CFR. The inspection took place on 7/11/2023 and no CFR has been received as of 8/2/2023. | ||||||||||
| 05/13/2022 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Parks, Jeff S | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 05/13/2022 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/17/2022 | Activity Closed By: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/17/2022 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/17/2022 | User: | PARKS_J_4 | ||||||||
| Description: | Jeff Parks from Lee County met with facility representatives to conduct the Compliance Inspection. TANKS: Inspected: Two (2) 12,000-gallon regular/premium double-walled, underground tanks to supply fuel dispensers. Tank interstitial: monitored via Veeder-Root TLS 350. Sensors: reading normal at time of inspection. SPILL CONTAINMENT: - Two (2) double-walled (DW) spill containment bucket(s) with dipstick to verify the interstitial, and a drain valve. The interstitial space was verified and found to be dry during the inspection. More than one inch of petroleum contact water/product was observed in premium/regular spill bucket. Clean out the spill bucket and disposed the liquid properly. The dipstick is broken and needs to be replaced. OVERFILL PROTECTION: – Equipped with an overfill prevention valve flapper in the drop tubes. The vents are present and observed to be in satisfactory condition. The fill ports are marked/color coded per API RP 1637. PIPING/SUMPS: Double-walled, fiberglass piping with a line leak detector and isolation valve. Secondary piping is open to the sump. More than one inch of water in the Reg/premium STP sump. Water more than one inch in depth or any regulated substances collected in secondary containment shall be removed within 72 hours of discovery and properly disposed. The sensor is suspended above the waterline. DISPENSERS CONTAINMENT: Five (5) dispensers with containment observed in satisfactory condition. Shear valves properly anchored. No evidence of cracking or product/liquid observed during the inspection. HOSES/NOZZLES: The hoses and nozzles appear to be in satisfactory condition. RELEASE DETECTION: The piping and tank interstices are continuously monitored via Veeder-Root TLS 350 equipped with visual and audible alarm. The visual and audible alarm panels were checked and found to be functioning properly. The Placard expiration date is: June 30, 2022. Storage tank registration fees are due to the Department each year by July 1. Ensure that your contact information is up-to-date with the Department in order to receive updates concerning your annual registration fees. Once fees are paid, you must print a copy of your placard from the Department's website: http://www.fldepportal.com/go/submit-registration/. Financial Responsibility must be maintained until your ASTs have been properly closed and your Closure Report/Limited Closure Report Form has been submitted to and approved by the Department. Records must be kept for three years. RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR THREE YEARS IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 62-761.710, F.A.C. Inspection Report sent by e-mail to: salinarabi@yahoo.com | ||||||||||
| 01/31/2019 | Editable Letter Activity | Sautter, Mark Allen | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | In Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/31/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 01/31/2019 | User: | SAUTTER_MA_2 | ||||||||
| Description: | ICL for inspection conducted on 01/25/2019 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 01/25/2019 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Sautter, Mark Allen | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | In Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 01/25/2019 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 01/31/2019 | Activity Closed By: | SAUTTER_MA_2 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/31/2019 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/25/2019 | User: | SAUTTER_MA_2 | ||||||||
| Description: | Checked required documentation (Visuals, insurance, maintenance records, etc..) along with required storage tank components (Tanks, lines, spill buckets, hoses, etc...) Updated registration info as needed. Alarm/Maintenance History: Nothing significant to note. | ||||||||||
| 01/31/2017 | Violation Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
| 01/31/2017 | Violation Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| 01/26/2017 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | In Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 01/26/2017 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 01/31/2017 | Activity Closed By: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/31/2017 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/26/2017 | User: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Checked required documentation (RDRL, Visuals, insurance, maintenance records, etc..) along with required storage tank components (Tanks, lines, spill buckets, hoses, etc...) Updated registration info as needed. Alarm/Maintenance History: Nothing significant to note. Leak detectors and AOT was not conducted annually. Last test was due on 04/16/2016. Testing was conducted on 01/31/2017 and pass. Violation were resolved prior to completing inspection. Facility need to ensure that testing is complete at the required times. | ||||||||||
| 05/21/2015 | Record Document Activity | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Sam Alverez (DBA Fuel Repairs) | Activity Closed Date: | 05/21/2015 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/21/2015 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 02/12/2015 | Editable Letter Activity | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/12/2015 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 02/12/2015 | User: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | NCL for inspection dated 02/10/2015 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 02/10/2015 | Violation Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| 02/10/2015 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Minor Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 02/10/2015 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/12/2015 | Activity Closed By: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/12/2015 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/10/2015 | User: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Checked required documentation (RDRL, Visuals, insurance, maintenance records, etc..) along with required storage tank components (Tanks, lines, spill buckets, hoses, etc...) Updated registration info as needed. Alarm/Maintenance History: Nothing significant to note. | ||||||||||
| 02/10/2015 | Violation Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
| 02/27/2014 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | In Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 02/27/2014 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/27/2014 | Activity Closed By: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 02/27/2014 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/27/2014 | User: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Items on Checklist/Violations tab were checked to complete re-inspection. Only re-inspection items were checked. | ||||||||||
| 11/27/2013 | Editable Letter Activity | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 11/27/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 11/27/2013 | User: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | NCL for inspection dated 11/26/2013 | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 11/25/2013 | Violation Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| 11/25/2013 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 11/25/2013 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 11/27/2013 | Activity Closed By: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 11/27/2013 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 11/25/2013 | User: | ZIMMERMAN_CA_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Checked required documentation (RDRL, Visuals, insurance, maintenance records, etc..) along with required storage tank components (Tanks, lines, spill buckets, hoses, etc...) Updated registration info as needed. Inspectors instructed the Manager on went was to be done for there monthly release detection and how it was to be documented. (IE: visually inspection dispenser and spill bucket secondary, printing out liquid status reports) | ||||||||||
| 11/25/2013 | Violation Closed | Zimmerman, Chris A. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1062 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 10/25/2012 | Attachment | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| 10/25/2012 | Record Document Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Chris Paras | Activity Closed Date: | 10/25/2012 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 10/25/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 10/25/2012 | Record Document Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||||
| Contact Name: | Leslie Pedigo | Activity Closed Date: | 10/25/2012 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 10/25/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 10/24/2012 | Editable Letter Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | District Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 10/25/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 10/25/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | 10 25 12 Non-compliance Letter | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 10/16/2012 | TCAR Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 07/21/2017 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/21/2017 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 10/16/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | 2010 UST disposal manifests | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 10/16/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | 2010 Tank cleanup manifest | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 10/16/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | PSSC Form | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 10/16/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Updated STRF | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 10/03/2012 | Violation Closed | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1122 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(1) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Was reasonable access to the facility granted? If not, document the circumstances. Were the records available within the specified time frame? If five day pre-inspection notice was not given by the inspector, this item can not be marked as a discrepancy. Make note of the missing documents, and arrange a review period. | ||||||||||
| 10/03/2012 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 10/03/2012 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 10/24/2012 | Activity Closed By: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 10/24/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/19/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | 10/3/12: Enforcement Inspection performed by your name Leslie Pedigo and Alison Meetze (FDEP) with Khalid Muzaffar (operator for Super Stop Petroleum) and Rosie present. The facility consists of: 2 double-wall USTs 3 piping sumps 3 spill buckets 5 dispensers Records Review: Placard ¿ Provided via email following the inspection. Release Detection Response Level ¿ not available for review. Release Detection Records ¿ not available for review nor provided following the inspection. Note: Rosie stated that she inspection the dispensers and spill buckets monthly. She stated she was told that she did not need to inspect the piping sumps. When asked for records, only inventory records were provided. Annual Testing Records ¿ not available for review. Physical Inspection: Tank #1A: 12,000-gallon regular unleaded. Tank Interstice: equipped with a sensor, L4; not in alarm. Spill bucket: half full of water. Cover painted to designate fuel type. Overfill Prevention: drop tube with flapper. Piping Sump: full of water, well above the piping inlet. Piping: fiberglass, Smith Red Thread. Sump Sensor: sump sensor under water; appears to be properly positioned; L1 (regular unleaded STP Sump) in alarm. Tank #2A: Compartmented ¿ 4,000-gallons premium unleaded and 8,000-gallons diesel. Tank Interstice: equipped with a sensor, L5; not in alarm. Spill buckets: full of water, half emptied by Rosie (water tossed on the pavement from the premium unleaded and containerized from the diesel). Covers painted to designate fuel type. Overfill Prevention: drop tube with flapper and ball check valve per registration coded. Piping Sumps: some moisture in the bottom. Piping: fiberglass, Smith Red Thread. Sump Sensor: sump sensors appear to be properly positioned at the bottom of the sumps; neither in alarm; L2 premium unleaded and L3 diesel. Dispenser liners: 1/2 1-2 inches liquid in the bottom. 3/4 damp on the bottom. 5/6 damp on the bottom. 7/8 1-2 inches liquid in the bottom. 9/10 ~1 inch liquid in the bottom. Shear Valves: all securely anchored. Hoses: all appear to be in good condition. Due to a problem with FIRST, the representative's signiture could not be collected for this inspection. | ||||||||||
| 10/03/2012 | Violation Closed | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1138 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.820(1)(a), 62-761.820(1)(b), 62-761.820(1)(c) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if an incident was not investigated, or not investigated properly. See rule 62-761.450(2) for incident reporting requirements. | ||||||||||
| 10/03/2012 | Violation Closed | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
| 10/03/2012 | Violation Closed | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1063 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(e) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | The electronic monitoring unit is a system consisting of a sensor, wiring, and a panel. The sensor and the component that it monitors are exempt from the visual inspection process. However, the proper operation of the remainder of the electronic system must be verified on a monthly basis. One way to test is to activate the panel alarm switch. Depending on the system in place this test may check the alarm light, alarm horn, or the circuit continuity between the panel and the remote sensor. This test procedure must be documented by the facility, as required in rule 62-761.710(2). The remote verification feature meets this requirement, such as the Veeder-Root Simplicity system. | ||||||||||
| 10/03/2012 | Violation Closed | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1010 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.450(2)(a)1., 62-761.450(2)(a)2., 62-761.450(2)(a)3., 62-761.450(2)(a)4., 62-761.450(2)(a)5., 62-761.450(2)(a)6., 62-761.450(2)(a)7. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Multiple incidents occurring at the same time at the facility may be reported on one form. #1-3 - Evidence of these types of INF situations are generally found during the inspector's paperwork review. Ask the facility representative what action they took in response, and in what time frame. If the situations are resolved within 24 hours, the owner/operator is not required to submit an INF to the local program. However, the actions they took to resolve the issue must be documented. #4-5, and 7 - Evidence of these types of situations are generally found during the outside or physical portion of the inspection. Give the facility owner/operator 24 hours to resolve, provided they document their actions. If they can not resolve the issues then they must submit the INF, at which time the two week investigative window opens. #6 - Evidence of this type of situation may be found during the physical examination of the release detection device (e.g. alarm mode), or during the examination of the records associated with the method. Note: Inspectors may find events that qualify as incidents during their review of the facility's paperwork. Such issues must have been resolved within 24 hours if an INF was not submitted at the time of the event. | ||||||||||
| 10/03/2012 | Violation Closed | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1003 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(2)(f) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | All federal facilities with USTs will have a placard. Per FS 376.3077, "It is unlawful for any owner, operator, or supplier to pump or otherwise deposit any motor fuel into a tank required to be registered under section 376.303 FS, unless proof of valid registration is displayed on such tank itself or the dispensing or measuring device connected thereto or, where appropriate, in the office or kiosk of the facility where the tank is located." Penalties can be assessed to the facility owner for failure to properly register tank systems. Note that penalties can be assessed to the supplier that delivers motor fuel to an unregistered facility. Check the details on the placard. Do they agree with the location you are inspecting? Owners of multiple facilities may switch placards by mistake. Placards are not always issued or received in a timely manner at the change of year period (June and July). Provide the DEP Tallahassee phone number to the facility so they may resolve problems (850) 245-8850; (850) 245-8840. Check STCM in the registration/placard section for the date that the payment was made and the date that the placard was issued. The location of the placard in plain view can be subjective in interpretation: a. For vehicular fuel facilities, plain view is meant to allow the transport delivery driver to view the placard prior to delivering fuel. b. A legal definition is an exception to the general requirement of a valid search warrant to legitimize a search or seizure; a search implies prying into hidden places, and it is not a search to observe what is open to view. | ||||||||||
| 10/03/2012 | Violation Closed | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
| 10/03/2012 | Violation Closed | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| 07/20/2012 | Phone Conversation Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| Call Type: | Outgoing | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Phone Number: | (727) 540-0931 | Activity Closed Date: | 07/20/2012 | ||||||||
| Subject: | I called Harold Hickcox, Adams Tank & Lift, to ask for the closure documents related to the November 2010 removal of the 3 single-walled USTs and 1 double-walled UST. When we got the files from DeSoto County, this file was not provided. I need the Limited Closure Summary Report, PSSC Form, tank and content disposal manifests. Harold will look through his file and get back to me next week. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/20/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| 06/19/2012 | Editable Letter Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 06/22/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Fri Jun 22 00:00:00 EDT 2012 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/22/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 06/22/2012 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | ncl | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 06/15/2012 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1062 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/23/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Release detection records (monthly visual examinations and sensor tapes) were not provided. Please provide release detection records for the next 3 months (November2012, December 2012 and January 2013). | ||||||||||
| 06/15/2012 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 06/15/2012 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 06/19/2012 | Activity Closed By: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/19/2012 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/15/2012 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 1-12,000 gallon dbl walled ust and 1-12,000 compartmented dbl walled UST. Using ball check valve, spill bucket, tight fill, level gauges and alarms flow shut off for overfill protection. Using monitoring of tank interstice, ATG,LLD,electronic monitoring of piping sumps, visual inspection of dispenser liners for release detection. sumps-satisfactory dispensers-satisfactory Veedeer root TLS 350-satisfactory hoses and nozzles-satisfactory Placard-satisfactory FR-not available for review CFR-not available for review RDRL-not available for review Annual ATG operabilitytest not available for review. Annual LLD test not available for review No evidence of discharge. | ||||||||||
| 06/15/2012 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1082 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(b), 62-761.640(1)(c) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the RDRL hasn't been written, or if the RDRL presented doesn't match the release detection methods used. Is reality different from their plan? Note that an SPCC or groundwater monitoring plan will suffice as an RDRL. See following sample form. RELEASE DETECTION RESPONSE LEVELS FACILITY NAME: ________________________________________ FACILITY #: ______________ In accordance with 62-761.600(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) the following Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) has been established for the checked method(s) of Release Detection: RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: One failed SIR report or two consecutive inconclusive SIR reports. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Continuous Automatic Tank Gauge System RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Automatic Tank Gauge System with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vacuum Monitoring RDRL: A sudden loss of vacuum or a 20% loss of the original vacuum. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Presence of free product or water. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Tank and Line Tightness Tests used with daily inventory reconciliation (available until 10 yrs. after last tank upgrade) RDRL: Failed tank and/or line tightness test, unexplained water fluctuations exceeding one inch; significant loss or gain. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Groundwater Monitoring Wells RDRL: Presence of free product or sheen. Discharge Report Form must be submitted within 24 hours. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vapor Monitoring Wells RDRL: Vapor concentrations >= 500 ppm for gasoline, Vapor concentrations >= 50 ppm for diesel RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Manual Tank Gauging (Only valid for tanks up to 2000 gals) RDRL: Readings exceeding the standards described in 62-761.640 Table MTG, F.A.C.. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Water above the entrance of double-wall piping or presence of free product. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Line Leak Detector RDRL: Tripping/Activation of leak detector. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Line Tightness Test RDRL: Failed tightness test As required by 62-761.200(71), F.A.C., if the RDRL is measured or observed, we will initiate activities to determine if an incident, release, or discharge has occurred. If within 24 hours we can not determine if a discharge occurred, an Incident Notification Form will be submitted | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/23/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | An RDRL was not available for review and has not been provided. Provide provide immediately. | ||||||||||
| 06/15/2012 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1004 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(3)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | There are various financial responsibility mechanisms available: Risk Retention Group (RRG) Endorsements Certificate of Insurance Guarantee Letter of Credit Fully Funded Trust Fund Self-Insurance with letter from CFO Stand-by Trust Fund Bond Rating Test (Local Governments) Local Government Financial Test Local Government Guarantee Local Government Fund For detailed information, refer to the DEP's Financial Responsibility Handbook pages 2-1, 2-2. Verify which mechanism(s) are used by the facility. State and federal facilities are exempt from financial responsibility, being considered a type of self insurance. They are always in compliance for this category. Document state or federal as appropriate. Financial responsibility must be maintained on out-of-service tanks. Note: Mark the absence of/or the lack of complete info in the certification of financial responsibility under Rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/23/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | The proof of current insurance policy (Ameican Safety Risk Retention Group, 6/4/12 to 6/4/13) was provided on 10/2/12. | ||||||||||
| 06/15/2012 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/23/2012 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Installation sensor tests were conducted on 1/12/11, the annual sensor tests, due 1/12/12 have not been provided. Please provide a copy of the test results if the tests were conducted or immediately schedule the tests and provide the results as soon as possible. | ||||||||||
| 06/15/2011 | Editable Letter Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | County Subsequent Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 06/15/2011 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Wed Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2011 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/15/2011 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 06/15/2011 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | ncl | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 11/23/2010 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | In Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 11/23/2010 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 01/07/2011 | Activity Closed By: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/07/2011 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 12/28/2010 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | New system installation Installation performed by Adams Tank and lift PCC# 050767 Installation of 1 12,000 gallon double walled tank, and 1 12,000 gallon compartmented double walled tank. Tanks installed level and secured with deadmen. Tanks: Metal Products EQ#333 Piping installed, primary piping pressure test PSI holding @60psi. All piping,joints, unions, and insertion points soap tested with no leaks observed. Piping: Smith Fiberglass Red Thread IIA EQ#252. Secondary piping pressure test conducted PSI holding @6PSI. All piping,joints, unions, and insertations soap tested with no leaks observed. Piping: Smith Fiberglass Red Thread IIA EQ@252 Dispenser liners and piping sumps hydro tested with no leaking observed. Dispenser liners: OPW Flexworks EQ#318 Piping Sumps: OPW Flexworks EQ#368 Emco Wheaton double walled spill buckets EQ#524 installed and vacuum tested. PSI held @31PSI Red Jacket pumps with mechanical LLD's EQ#373 installed in piping sumps. Manual shut off valves also installed on piping inside piping sumps. Vedeer root TLS 350 EQ# 033 installed Associated sensors for interstitial space and piping sumps installed Vedeer Root sensors model #794380 EQ#614 Vedeer Root system tested sensors triggered with all alarms functioning properly Dispensers in place with all shear valves installed and secure. All fill tubes installed. Facility will be using Ball check valve, spill bucket, tight fill, level gauges and alarms,and flow shut off for overfill protection. Using monitoring of tank interstitial space,ATG, mechanical LLD, electronic monitoring of piping sumps, and visual monitoring of dispenser liners for release detection. Contractor form submitted STRF submitted Line tests submitted-conducted 12/22 -passed LLD tests submitted-conducted 12/22-passed Need to submit final Vedeer Root test results. | ||||||||||
| 11/18/2010 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | In Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 11/18/2010 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 01/07/2011 | Activity Closed By: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 01/07/2011 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 11/18/2010 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Tank closure Facility was using ball check valve, tight fill, flow shut off and spill bucket for overfill protection. Was using LLD, visual inspection of piping sumps and dispenser liners, and SIR for release detection. Tank and all fuel components being removed. Tank removal being performed by Adams Tank and Lift PCC # 050767 Removal of 3 single walled 10,000 gallon fiberglass USTs, and 1 double walled 10,000 gallon steel UST. All associated piping and components also removed. Dispensers are being retained to use with new system. Aqua Clean on site cleaning and preparing tanks for removal. Most portions of the fiberglass tanks were crushed during removal they were unable to excavate and remove tanks undamaged. Can not verify if there were any perferations in tanks.1 tank came out mostly whole no perforations noted The steel tank was removed, cut and vented. No perforations observed in tank. No odor or sheen observed in excavation area. Dewatering will have to be done prior to new tank install No environmental companies on site during site visits, unsure what company and what assessments were conducted. Need Certified contractor form, disposal manifest for tanks, and STRF showing closure of tanks and components. | ||||||||||
| 10/29/2010 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 10/29/2010 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 10/29/2010 | Activity Closed By: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 10/29/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 10/29/2010 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | This facility is under consent order and has been placed out of service. No product is in the tanks. Fill ports are not locked and secure. Inspection to verify if facility is out of service. All previous violations remain. Violations that have been corrected and addressed by DEP General Counsel are as follows: LLD annual testing completed 3/12/2010-passed Hydrostatic line leak test 3/12/2010-passed Precision tank test 3/12/2010-passed 3-10,000 gallon single walled UST's, 1-10,000 gallon double walled UST. Using ball check valve, Tight fill, flow shut off, spill bucket for overfill protection Using LLD, visual inspection of piping sumps and dispenser liners, SIR for release detection. No evidence of insurance coverage *NOTE* All single walled tank systems should have been either upgraded or removed by December 31, 2009. No evidence of discharge observed during inspectio | ||||||||||
| 06/01/2010 | Editable Letter Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 06/02/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Wed Jun 02 00:00:00 EDT 2010 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 06/01/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 06/14/2010 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | NCL | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 05/18/2010 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/19/2010 | Activity Closed By: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 05/19/2010 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/19/2010 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 3-10,000 gallon single walled UST's, 1-10,000 gallon double walled UST. Using ball check valve, Tight fill, flow shut off, spill bucket for overfill protection Using LLD, visual inspection of piping sumps and dispenser liners, SIR for release detection. CFR+FR-unsatisfactory. No evidence of insurance coverage No CFR page available for review RDRL-unsatisfactory Placard-unsatisfactory Placard not displayed Monthly visual inspections-unsatisfactory No evidence that monthly visual inspections are conducted. SIR-Unsatisfactory no reports available for review Annual tests-unsatisfactory The annual tests for the LLd's and single walled piping are extremly overdue. Tank Tightness tests-unsatisfactory Tank test has not been conducted. Tank Components: Vacuum gauge reading approximately 8 PSI. No other documented readings to determine if this reading is normal. Vacuum monitoring is not an approved method of release detection for this facility. An alternate release detection method needs to be instituted. Piping sumps-unsatisfactory The diesel sump is completely full with water. Water covers all piping and pumps. The pumps in the other piping sumps are very corroded and should be cleaned and checked. Unable to determine if LLD's are even still attached to pumps due to excessive corrosion. Spill buckets-satisfactory Dispenser liners-satisfactory, except dispenser1+2, liner is full of water. Hoses and nozzles-satisfactory *NOTE* All single walled tank systems should have been either upgraded or removed by December 31, 2009. No evidence of discharge observed during inspection | ||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1077 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.610(3)(a)2.a., 62-761.610(3)(a)2.b. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | There are two types of piping leak detectors. 1. Mechanical (flow restrictive), 2. Electronic (automatic shutoff). Mark this as out of compliance if single-walled pressurized small diameter piping in contact with the soil does not have a line leak detector, isn't conducting an annual tightness test, or doesn't have an external release detection method. Rule 62-761.610(1)(b) covers release detection for Category-C UST systems. Rule 62-761.610(2) deals with release detection for Category-A and B UST systems. Rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.610(3)(a)2, 62-761.610(3)(b) & 62-761.610(3)(c) deal with all piping release detection. | ||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1093 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(a)3.a., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.b., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.c. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Look at the equipment and the records. Compare the current vacuum readings with the original vacuum readings at installation (if available). Mark this as out of compliance if the vacuum has decreased by more than 20%. Repairs should be noted under rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)2, 62-761.700(1)(a)3, 62-761.700(1)(a)4, 62-761.700(1)(a)5 & 62-761.700(1)(a)6. | ||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1101 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(e)9. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | May use the approved form, or if another form is used, then verify that the form used contains all data from Form .900(7). | ||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1062 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1004 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(3)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | There are various financial responsibility mechanisms available: Risk Retention Group (RRG) Endorsements Certificate of Insurance Guarantee Letter of Credit Fully Funded Trust Fund Self-Insurance with letter from CFO Stand-by Trust Fund Bond Rating Test (Local Governments) Local Government Financial Test Local Government Guarantee Local Government Fund For detailed information, refer to the DEP's Financial Responsibility Handbook pages 2-1, 2-2. Verify which mechanism(s) are used by the facility. State and federal facilities are exempt from financial responsibility, being considered a type of self insurance. They are always in compliance for this category. Document state or federal as appropriate. Financial responsibility must be maintained on out-of-service tanks. Note: Mark the absence of/or the lack of complete info in the certification of financial responsibility under Rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1003 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(2)(f) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | All federal facilities with USTs will have a placard. Per FS 376.3077, "It is unlawful for any owner, operator, or supplier to pump or otherwise deposit any motor fuel into a tank required to be registered under section 376.303 FS, unless proof of valid registration is displayed on such tank itself or the dispensing or measuring device connected thereto or, where appropriate, in the office or kiosk of the facility where the tank is located." Penalties can be assessed to the facility owner for failure to properly register tank systems. Note that penalties can be assessed to the supplier that delivers motor fuel to an unregistered facility. Check the details on the placard. Do they agree with the location you are inspecting? Owners of multiple facilities may switch placards by mistake. Placards are not always issued or received in a timely manner at the change of year period (June and July). Provide the DEP Tallahassee phone number to the facility so they may resolve problems (850) 245-8850; (850) 245-8840. Check STCM in the registration/placard section for the date that the payment was made and the date that the placard was issued. The location of the placard in plain view can be subjective in interpretation: a. For vehicular fuel facilities, plain view is meant to allow the transport delivery driver to view the placard prior to delivering fuel. b. A legal definition is an exception to the general requirement of a valid search warrant to legitimize a search or seizure; a search implies prying into hidden places, and it is not a search to observe what is open to view. | ||||||||||
| 05/18/2010 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1028 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.500(2)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Tanks with brine filled interstices (hydrostatic interstitial monitoring) may not require additional tank tightness testing. Refer to the equipment's EQ. The principle behind hydrostatic interstitial monitoring is: If a leak should develop in the inner tank, the liquid level in the reservoir will drop as the monitoring fluid drains into the primary tank. If a leak develops in the outer wall, the monitoring fluid will drain into the excavation. If a leak occurs in the outer wall during high groundwater conditions, the level of monitoring fluid will rise in the interstitial space. During the tank installation process a reservoir probe will be installed to allow gauging of the brine level. Vacuum equipped tanks also may not require additional tank tightness testing. Refer to the equipment's EQ. When reviewing tightness test data, look at more than just pass/fail. Review the DEP master equipment list, especially comments concerning: minimum test time, minimum product volume, size of tank. Precision tightness test methods can be classified as volumetric and non volumetric. The volumetric procedure measures the change in product volume or level over time to determine if a leak has occurred, and accounts or compensates for three major variables: temperature variation, tank distortion, and product stabilization time. Volumetric test can be both overfill and underfill methodologies. Non volumetric methods do not measure a fluctuation in product level, rather, they utilize acoustical or vacuum methods to determine a change in equipment condition. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Editable Letter Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 01/22/2009 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 01/22/2009 | Activity Closed By: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/22/2009 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 3-10,000 gallon single walled UST's, 1-10,000 gallon double walled UST. Using ball check valve, Tight fill, flow shut off, spill bucket for overfill protection Using LLD, visual inspection of piping sumps and dispenser liners, SIR for release detection. CFR+FR-unsatisfactory. No evidence of insurance coverage for the 3 single walled tanks. Only evidence of coverage for the double walled tank. No CFR page available for review-form provided RDRL-unsatisfactory RDRL form provided Placard-unsatisfactory Placard not displayed nor evidence that registration fees have been paid. Monthly visual inspections-unsatisfactory No evidence that monthly visual inspections are conducted. SIR-Unsatisfactory SIR's were not being conducted until September 2008. Although SIR's have now been conducted for September through December 2008 Please continue to do SIR's monthly. SIR review: SIR reports provided by Discovery Tank Testing using Simmons Corporation SIR reconciliation method EQ# 624 9/2008-passed-no reportable loss. 10/2008-passed-no reportable loss 11/2008-1 inclusive-Regular unleaded noted operational procedures inventory control status fail others-passed-no reportable loss 12/2008-1 inclusive-regular unleaded noted operational procedures inventory control status fail others passed-no reportable loss. Please investigate reason for inclusive SIR report for the regular unleaded, and document reason and any corrective actions. Annual tests-unsatisfactory The annual tests for the LLd's and single walled piping are extremly overdue. Tank Tightness tests-unsatisfactory Tank test has not been conducted. Tank Components: Vacuum gauge reading approximately 8 PSI. No other documented readings to determine if this reading is normal. Vacuum monitoring is not an approved method of release detection for this facility. An alternate release detection method needs to be instituted. Piping sumps-unsatisfactory The diesel sump is completely full with water. Water covers all piping and pumps. The pumps in the other piping sumps are very corroded and should be cleaned and checked. Unable to determine if LLD's are even still attached to pumps due to excessive corrosion. Spill buckets-satisfactory Dispenser liners-satisfactory, except dispenser1+2, liner is full of water. Hoses and nozzles-satisfactory No observable evidence of discharge New owner of facility is: Daibies Florida Leasing/Worldtrust Inc. 1000 Portside Drive Edgewater, NJ 07020 Please submit a STRF for new ownership and to update tank, piping, monitoring attributes. *NOTE* All single walled tank systems must either be upgraded or removed by December 31, 2009. No evidence of discharge observed during inspection | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1122 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(1) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Was reasonable access to the facility granted? If not, document the circumstances. Were the records available within the specified time frame? If five day pre-inspection notice was not given by the inspector, this item can not be marked as a discrepancy. Make note of the missing documents, and arrange a review period. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1003 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(2)(f) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | All federal facilities with USTs will have a placard. Per FS 376.3077, "It is unlawful for any owner, operator, or supplier to pump or otherwise deposit any motor fuel into a tank required to be registered under section 376.303 FS, unless proof of valid registration is displayed on such tank itself or the dispensing or measuring device connected thereto or, where appropriate, in the office or kiosk of the facility where the tank is located." Penalties can be assessed to the facility owner for failure to properly register tank systems. Note that penalties can be assessed to the supplier that delivers motor fuel to an unregistered facility. Check the details on the placard. Do they agree with the location you are inspecting? Owners of multiple facilities may switch placards by mistake. Placards are not always issued or received in a timely manner at the change of year period (June and July). Provide the DEP Tallahassee phone number to the facility so they may resolve problems (850) 245-8850; (850) 245-8840. Check STCM in the registration/placard section for the date that the payment was made and the date that the placard was issued. The location of the placard in plain view can be subjective in interpretation: a. For vehicular fuel facilities, plain view is meant to allow the transport delivery driver to view the placard prior to delivering fuel. b. A legal definition is an exception to the general requirement of a valid search warrant to legitimize a search or seizure; a search implies prying into hidden places, and it is not a search to observe what is open to view. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1002 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(2)(a) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Does STCM accurately reflect the tanks at the facility? This question concerns the registration process and payment of fees only - it is not about accurate registration. Check the number of tanks listed on the registration placard. Can the facility owner/operator produce a registration form to document submittal to DEP? Does STCM show that all DEP fees are paid? At the time of tank closure, a registration form should be submitted showing the change in tank codes. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1004 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(3)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | There are various financial responsibility mechanisms available: Risk Retention Group (RRG) Endorsements Certificate of Insurance Guarantee Letter of Credit Fully Funded Trust Fund Self-Insurance with letter from CFO Stand-by Trust Fund Bond Rating Test (Local Governments) Local Government Financial Test Local Government Guarantee Local Government Fund For detailed information, refer to the DEP's Financial Responsibility Handbook pages 2-1, 2-2. Verify which mechanism(s) are used by the facility. State and federal facilities are exempt from financial responsibility, being considered a type of self insurance. They are always in compliance for this category. Document state or federal as appropriate. Financial responsibility must be maintained on out-of-service tanks. Note: Mark the absence of/or the lack of complete info in the certification of financial responsibility under Rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1103 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1101 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(e)9. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | May use the approved form, or if another form is used, then verify that the form used contains all data from Form .900(7). | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1100 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(e)1., 62-761.640(3)(e)2., 62-761.640(3)(e)3., 62-761.640(3)(e)4., 62-761.640(3)(e)5. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if SIR results are not calculated properly. Calculated Leak Rate [CLR]- a quantitative expression in gph, calculated to determine the leak status of a tank. A positive gph value may be indicative of product leaking out of the tank system and a negative gph value may be indicative of a volume gain to the tank. Leak Threshold [LT]- represents the action level portion of the leak rate. While the performance standard is 0.2 gph, the threshold is generally one half that rate. Examine the DEP Master Equipment book for the SIR version in use. Minimum Detectable Leak Rate [MDL]- is the smallest leak rate the vendor can determine for the data provided with a Pd of 95% or higher. If the CLR < LT and MDL < 0.2 gph, then the result is a PASS If the MDL > 0.2 gph and CLR < LT, then the result is an INCONCLUSIVE If the CLR > LT, then the result is a FAIL | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1102 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(f)1., 62-761.640(3)(f)2., 62-761.640(3)(f)3., 62-761.640(3)(f)4. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | a. Tightness test method meets 0.1 gph performance standard. What is the pass/fail threshold? Look up the test method in the DEP Master Equipment book. Compare the threshold to the actual test data. b. The various test effects are compensated for by the test developer. Request a copy of the operation manual from the RQ tester or the test developer. While not specifically mentioned, the amount of water present in the tank at the start of the test is required to be recorded. c. Test methods generally test the: wetted portion of the tank (product), and the ullage (air space above the product). d. Define which test method is used: volumetric or non volumetric. e. The tester, especially with single-walled tanks, must know the depth to groundwater especially relative to the tank and the product level. The rule compensates for this by setting two minimum product volume values. 30% if depth actually known, 65% if unknown. f. Do overfill and spill containment devices interfere with the test method? This is something the RQ tester must determine, and they may remove these pieces of equipment. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1095 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(b)1.a., 62-761.640(3)(b)1.b., 62-761.640(3)(b)2.a., 62-761.640(3)(b)2.b., 62-761.640(3)(b)2.c., 62-761.640(3)(b)2.d., 62-761.640(3)(b)2.e. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if inventory records are not properly performed. For inventory reconciliation, list the type of product on the top of the form along with tank volume. Volume measurements of product in tank, amount used or sold and amount delivered are to be in gallons. ATGs can be used to collect tank volume/water level data. (It is recommended that the facility compare ATG volume to actual stick measurements on a routine basis; this can also be done by dispensing a measured amount of fuel.) If the facility does not use an ATG to collect water volume, do they have the appropriate gauging stick and paste? What is the condition of their stick? .700(1)(c)5 methods of inventory control includes: inventory reconciliation, SIR, ATG, and MTG. (See rule 62-761.700(1)(c)5). Inventory control is not required for non-vehicular fuels single-walled tanks, e.g. waste oil. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1093 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(a)3.a., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.b., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.c. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Look at the equipment and the records. Compare the current vacuum readings with the original vacuum readings at installation (if available). Mark this as out of compliance if the vacuum has decreased by more than 20%. Repairs should be noted under rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)2, 62-761.700(1)(a)3, 62-761.700(1)(a)4, 62-761.700(1)(a)5 & 62-761.700(1)(a)6. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1077 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.610(3)(a)2.a., 62-761.610(3)(a)2.b. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | There are two types of piping leak detectors. 1. Mechanical (flow restrictive), 2. Electronic (automatic shutoff). Mark this as out of compliance if single-walled pressurized small diameter piping in contact with the soil does not have a line leak detector, isn't conducting an annual tightness test, or doesn't have an external release detection method. Rule 62-761.610(1)(b) covers release detection for Category-C UST systems. Rule 62-761.610(2) deals with release detection for Category-A and B UST systems. Rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.610(3)(a)2, 62-761.610(3)(b) & 62-761.610(3)(c) deal with all piping release detection. | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1082 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(b), 62-761.640(1)(c) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the RDRL hasn't been written, or if the RDRL presented doesn't match the release detection methods used. Is reality different from their plan? Note that an SPCC or groundwater monitoring plan will suffice as an RDRL. See following sample form. RELEASE DETECTION RESPONSE LEVELS FACILITY NAME: ________________________________________ FACILITY #: ______________ In accordance with 62-761.600(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) the following Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) has been established for the checked method(s) of Release Detection: RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: One failed SIR report or two consecutive inconclusive SIR reports. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Continuous Automatic Tank Gauge System RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Automatic Tank Gauge System with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vacuum Monitoring RDRL: A sudden loss of vacuum or a 20% loss of the original vacuum. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Presence of free product or water. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Tank and Line Tightness Tests used with daily inventory reconciliation (available until 10 yrs. after last tank upgrade) RDRL: Failed tank and/or line tightness test, unexplained water fluctuations exceeding one inch; significant loss or gain. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Groundwater Monitoring Wells RDRL: Presence of free product or sheen. Discharge Report Form must be submitted within 24 hours. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vapor Monitoring Wells RDRL: Vapor concentrations >= 500 ppm for gasoline, Vapor concentrations >= 50 ppm for diesel RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Manual Tank Gauging (Only valid for tanks up to 2000 gals) RDRL: Readings exceeding the standards described in 62-761.640 Table MTG, F.A.C.. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Water above the entrance of double-wall piping or presence of free product. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Line Leak Detector RDRL: Tripping/Activation of leak detector. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Line Tightness Test RDRL: Failed tightness test As required by 62-761.200(71), F.A.C., if the RDRL is measured or observed, we will initiate activities to determine if an incident, release, or discharge has occurred. If within 24 hours we can not determine if a discharge occurred, an Incident Notification Form will be submitted | ||||||||||
| 01/22/2009 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1062 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1032 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.500(5)(a) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Does not apply to aviation fuels, which have a different color scheme (see API Bulletin 1542 which is not a reference standard). Fillbox covers are to be labeled using one of the following methods: a. Painting or placing a decal on top of the cover and on the rim of the fillbox. b. Attaching a tag to the fill pipe adapter. c. Screwing a tag onto the fillbox rim. d. Fitting a plastic or fiberglass insert inside the rim of the fillbox. Refer to the color coded chart included in the API 1637 Reference Standard. | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Editable Letter Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | 1st Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 05/14/2008 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/14/2008 | Activity Closed By: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 05/14/2008 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 3-10,000 gallon, 1-10,000 gallon double walled diesel UST's Using spill bucket, ball check valve, flow shut off, tight fill for overfill protection. Using SIR, visual inspection of piping sumps and dispenser liners, LLD, vacuum monitoring for release detection. CFR+FR-satisfactory exp.12/2008 Placard-unsatisfactory Placard not displayed nor evidence that fees have been paid. RDRL-unsatisfactory No RDRL available for review. Vacuum monitoring-unsatisfactory No record of vacuum monitoring being performed. Monthly release detection-unsatisfactory No evidence of release detection being performed before 11/14/07, or after 2/13/08. SIR-unsatisfactory No SIR reports available for review. Diesel Tank: Vacuum reading 12 psi Piping sump completely full of water. Unable to inspect piping and pump.-Unsatisfactory Other piping sumps-satisfactory Dispenser liners dry The shear valves and fittings in the interior of many of the dispensers are extremely corroded due to excessive water remaining in liners. Many of the dispenser hoses are cracking and should be replaced. Fill port lids need to be repainted. STRF needs to be submitted showing change of ownership. *NOTE* all single walled tanks need to be removed or upgraded by 12/31/2009. | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1124 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(3)(a), 62-761.710(3)(b), 62-761.710(3)(c), 62-761.710(3)(d), 62-761.710(3)(e), 62-761.710(3)(f), 62-761.710(3)(g), 62-761.710(3)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | The Rule cites does not list routine operation and maintenance records. If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. Periodic inspections and tank system measurements - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.700(4)-(5) & 62-761.700(6) b. Supporting claims for equipment in use at facility. - rule 62-761.600(1)(a)3 c. History of what has been done at facility - see 62-761.500 rules. d. Cathodic protection system history - rules 62-761.500(1)(e)1 & 62-761500(1)(e)3 e. Site suitability determination - this document must be updated when site conditions change- rule 62-761.600(1)(f) f. Vapor monitoring plan - this document must be updated annually - rule 62-761.600(1)(g) g. Closure reports - rule 62-761.800(3)(d) h. Single check valve - PSSC documentation that no other buried valves exist - rule 62-761.610(3)(a)1 | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1009 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.450(1)(b)1., 62-761.450(1)(b)2., 62-761.450(1)(b)3., 62-761.450(1)(b)4. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Confirm ownership changes with the facility representative. If needed, research the new owner information with the facility's other licenses, especially alcoholic beverage and occupational. Note that new personnel or a change in name may just reflect the sale of the business rather than sale of the property. If a change of ownership has occurred, allow a reasonable time (a recommended time frame can be approximately 1-3 months) for the DEP database to be updated. Ask the facility to produce a dated registration form. Mark it as a discrepancy if a longer time frame has elapsed. Note: DEP Registration Section may change the ownership without receiving any additional proof, other than a registration form. Has the Certification of Financial Responsibility been revised? | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1003 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(2)(f) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | All federal facilities with USTs will have a placard. Per FS 376.3077, "It is unlawful for any owner, operator, or supplier to pump or otherwise deposit any motor fuel into a tank required to be registered under section 376.303 FS, unless proof of valid registration is displayed on such tank itself or the dispensing or measuring device connected thereto or, where appropriate, in the office or kiosk of the facility where the tank is located." Penalties can be assessed to the facility owner for failure to properly register tank systems. Note that penalties can be assessed to the supplier that delivers motor fuel to an unregistered facility. Check the details on the placard. Do they agree with the location you are inspecting? Owners of multiple facilities may switch placards by mistake. Placards are not always issued or received in a timely manner at the change of year period (June and July). Provide the DEP Tallahassee phone number to the facility so they may resolve problems (850) 245-8850; (850) 245-8840. Check STCM in the registration/placard section for the date that the payment was made and the date that the placard was issued. The location of the placard in plain view can be subjective in interpretation: a. For vehicular fuel facilities, plain view is meant to allow the transport delivery driver to view the placard prior to delivering fuel. b. A legal definition is an exception to the general requirement of a valid search warrant to legitimize a search or seizure; a search implies prying into hidden places, and it is not a search to observe what is open to view. | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1002 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(2)(a) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Does STCM accurately reflect the tanks at the facility? This question concerns the registration process and payment of fees only - it is not about accurate registration. Check the number of tanks listed on the registration placard. Can the facility owner/operator produce a registration form to document submittal to DEP? Does STCM show that all DEP fees are paid? At the time of tank closure, a registration form should be submitted showing the change in tank codes. | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1101 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(e)9. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | May use the approved form, or if another form is used, then verify that the form used contains all data from Form .900(7). | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1100 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(e)1., 62-761.640(3)(e)2., 62-761.640(3)(e)3., 62-761.640(3)(e)4., 62-761.640(3)(e)5. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if SIR results are not calculated properly. Calculated Leak Rate [CLR]- a quantitative expression in gph, calculated to determine the leak status of a tank. A positive gph value may be indicative of product leaking out of the tank system and a negative gph value may be indicative of a volume gain to the tank. Leak Threshold [LT]- represents the action level portion of the leak rate. While the performance standard is 0.2 gph, the threshold is generally one half that rate. Examine the DEP Master Equipment book for the SIR version in use. Minimum Detectable Leak Rate [MDL]- is the smallest leak rate the vendor can determine for the data provided with a Pd of 95% or higher. If the CLR < LT and MDL < 0.2 gph, then the result is a PASS If the MDL > 0.2 gph and CLR < LT, then the result is an INCONCLUSIVE If the CLR > LT, then the result is a FAIL | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1093 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(a)3.a., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.b., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.c. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Look at the equipment and the records. Compare the current vacuum readings with the original vacuum readings at installation (if available). Mark this as out of compliance if the vacuum has decreased by more than 20%. Repairs should be noted under rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)2, 62-761.700(1)(a)3, 62-761.700(1)(a)4, 62-761.700(1)(a)5 & 62-761.700(1)(a)6. | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1082 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(b), 62-761.640(1)(c) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if the RDRL hasn't been written, or if the RDRL presented doesn't match the release detection methods used. Is reality different from their plan? Note that an SPCC or groundwater monitoring plan will suffice as an RDRL. See following sample form. RELEASE DETECTION RESPONSE LEVELS FACILITY NAME: ________________________________________ FACILITY #: ______________ In accordance with 62-761.600(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) the following Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) has been established for the checked method(s) of Release Detection: RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: One failed SIR report or two consecutive inconclusive SIR reports. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Continuous Automatic Tank Gauge System RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Automatic Tank Gauge System with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vacuum Monitoring RDRL: A sudden loss of vacuum or a 20% loss of the original vacuum. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Presence of free product or water. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Tank and Line Tightness Tests used with daily inventory reconciliation (available until 10 yrs. after last tank upgrade) RDRL: Failed tank and/or line tightness test, unexplained water fluctuations exceeding one inch; significant loss or gain. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Groundwater Monitoring Wells RDRL: Presence of free product or sheen. Discharge Report Form must be submitted within 24 hours. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vapor Monitoring Wells RDRL: Vapor concentrations >= 500 ppm for gasoline, Vapor concentrations >= 50 ppm for diesel RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Manual Tank Gauging (Only valid for tanks up to 2000 gals) RDRL: Readings exceeding the standards described in 62-761.640 Table MTG, F.A.C.. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Water above the entrance of double-wall piping or presence of free product. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Line Leak Detector RDRL: Tripping/Activation of leak detector. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Line Tightness Test RDRL: Failed tightness test As required by 62-761.200(71), F.A.C., if the RDRL is measured or observed, we will initiate activities to determine if an incident, release, or discharge has occurred. If within 24 hours we can not determine if a discharge occurred, an Incident Notification Form will be submitted | ||||||||||
| 05/14/2008 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1062 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 08/31/2007 | Enforcement Tracking Activity | Pedigo, Leslie | |||||||||
| OGC Case Number: | 10-1565 | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Result: | Closed With Enforcement | Activity Closed Date: | 07/28/2017 | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been finished | Date: | 07/28/2017 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Finished | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/31/2007 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | This site is part of the state wide AJ Petroleum case. | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 07/28/2017 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Case Closure Memo | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 06/21/2007 | Violation Closed | Marsh, Larry | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1004 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.400(3)(a)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | There are various financial responsibility mechanisms available: Risk Retention Group (RRG) Endorsements Certificate of Insurance Guarantee Letter of Credit Fully Funded Trust Fund Self-Insurance with letter from CFO Stand-by Trust Fund Bond Rating Test (Local Governments) Local Government Financial Test Local Government Guarantee Local Government Fund For detailed information, refer to the DEP's Financial Responsibility Handbook pages 2-1, 2-2. Verify which mechanism(s) are used by the facility. State and federal facilities are exempt from financial responsibility, being considered a type of self insurance. They are always in compliance for this category. Document state or federal as appropriate. Financial responsibility must be maintained on out-of-service tanks. Note: Mark the absence of/or the lack of complete info in the certification of financial responsibility under Rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| 06/21/2007 | Editable Letter Activity | Marsh, Larry | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | District Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 06/21/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Thu Jun 21 00:00:00 EST 2007 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 04/27/2009 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Annual Operability completed on 4/21/09 Adams Tank and Lift (passing). | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 06/21/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | NCL Report | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 06/20/2007 | Violation Closed | Marsh, Larry | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1066 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Visual monitoring or manual sampling: The idea is to visually inspect the interstice or inside containment area for product. Works well with piping sumps, dispenser liners, integral piping J ports, tanks with interstitial ports. Continuous electronic sensing equipment: Panel on the wall, probe in the interstice. Variety of probes: liquid (petroleum discriminating/ non discriminating), vapor, optical. Hydrostatic monitoring systems: Liquid level readings recorded monthly, or electronically monitored with an alarm. Vacuum monitoring: Vacuum readings recorded monthly, or equipped with a low vacuum alarm. | ||||||||||
| 06/14/2007 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Marsh, Larry | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 06/14/2007 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 06/21/2007 | Activity Closed By: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | QAQC inspection performed by Larry Marsh and Logan Randolph, DEP SWD, on June 14, 2007. Met onsite by station manager Nazmul Hoque Chowdhury, PH No. 863-990-8978. He informed us the Global Energy had recently purchased the property from A.J. Petroleum in May 2007. Global Energy COO James Ferullo will be a contact person for the facility. Mr. Ferullo was called during the inspection and asked to provide current documents. He was later contacted on 6/20/07 and asked again for these documents. Release detection is monthly visual inspection of dispenser liners, hoses, spill buckets, street boxes and piping sumps, SIR analysis (Teledata Version 2.1, EQ# 532) of the three single-walled tanks, and vacuum monitoring of the double-walled tank interstice. Note that an alternate procedure has not been obtained to allow vacuum monitoring of the double-walled diesel tank; therefore this tank lacks a valid method of interstitial monitoring. Please apply for an alternate procedure to allow for vacuum monitoring or initiate an approved method of interstitial monitoring. Placard and RDRL current, no current insurance policy or Certificate of Financial Responsibility were found onsite. Information regarding a previous policy by the former owners was fond onsite, but that policy did not have correct tank information, only three tanks were shown. No current line leak detector tests were available. Last line leak detector tests were performed on 8/9/05 and were due on 8/9/06. No current line tightness tests for the three single-walled lines were found onsite. Last passing line tightness tests found onsite were performed in 2003. Invoices and the County inspection indicate that a line tightness test was performed on 8/9/05 and due on 8/9/05. Please maintain copies of all test data. Last tank tightness tests passed on 8/9/05, next tests due 8/9/08. Visual inspection reports were reviewed from 1/06 ¿ 6/07. Two companies were performing monthly visuals for part of 2006, generating as many as three inspections in a single calendar month. After 7/06, only one set of records was found. Some monthly records lacked actual inspection dates (11/06 and 12/06). One exceedence of the 35 day time limit was noted (7/16/06 ¿ 8/23/06). No visual inspections were performed after 12/06, which is when the new operator started running the store. SIR records were reviewed from 6/05 ¿ 6/07. Many records were missing. Several SIR reports were not generated until more than 20 days after the previous month (10/05, 2/06, 5/06). Others lacked calculated leak rates and report dates (6/05, 7/05). No SIR reports were found after 5/06. The current vacuum gauge reading for the diesel tank was 16 mm Hg. This reading has varied from a low of 11 mm Hg to a high of 16 mm Hg. Such variation is unusual and should be investigated if vacuum readings are to be continued as a means of release detection after obtaining an approved alternate procedure request. Any variation greater than 20% is not allowed. Water was found in the diesel piping sump, the inner sump lid was floating. Street boxes had soil accumulation around piping and pump units. Spill buckets were ok, some liquid was found in each. Fill covers are beginning to wear and lose their colors. Diesel and liquid were found in several dispenser liners. Dispenser liners showed evidence of prolonged exposure to water causing corrosion of the shear valves. Please verify that all shear valves are functional. The diesel satellite dispenser had been hit by a vehicle and was tilted. This dispenser is non-functional. Several hoses were showing the beginnings of wear and others were damaged and need to be replaced. The three single-walled systems must be taken out of service, closed or upgraded with a double-walled system no later than 12/31/07. | ||||||||||
| 06/12/2007 | Enforcement Referral Activity - OLD Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| No data found! | |||||||||||
| 06/12/2007 | Enforcement Referral Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Accepted | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 08/31/2007 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was accepted on this date | Date: | 08/31/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | O.K. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was acknowledged on this date | Date: | 08/13/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Part of statewide AJ enforcement case. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 06/12/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Enforcement refferal | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/31/2007 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | O.K. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/13/2007 | User: | CULBRETH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Part of statewide AJ enforcement case. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/12/2007 | User: | UNKNOWN | ||||||||
| Description: | Enforcement refferal | ||||||||||
| 06/12/2007 | Enforcement Referral Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Accepted | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 08/31/2007 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was accepted on this date | Date: | 08/31/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | O.K. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was acknowledged on this date | Date: | 08/13/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Part of statewide AJ enforcement case. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 06/12/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Enforcement refferal | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/31/2007 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | O.K. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/13/2007 | User: | CULBRETH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Part of statewide AJ enforcement case. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/12/2007 | User: | UNKNOWN | ||||||||
| Description: | Enforcement refferal | ||||||||||
| 06/12/2007 | Enforcement Referral Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Accepted | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 08/31/2007 | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was accepted on this date | Date: | 08/31/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | O.K. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity/Document was acknowledged on this date | Date: | 08/13/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Part of statewide AJ enforcement case. | ||||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Activity has been submitted for approval | Date: | 06/12/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Enforcement refferal | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/31/2007 | User: | PEDIGO_L | ||||||||
| Description: | O.K. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 08/13/2007 | User: | CULBRETH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Part of statewide AJ enforcement case. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/12/2007 | User: | UNKNOWN | ||||||||
| Description: | Enforcement refferal | ||||||||||
| 06/06/2007 | Attachment | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| 06/06/2007 | Attachment | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| 05/22/2007 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 05/22/2007 | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2007 | Attachment | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Attachment | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Editable Letter Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Title: | District Non-Compliance Letter | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Events: | |||||||||||
| Event Type: | Document has been sent | Date: | 04/30/2007 | ||||||||
| Comment: | Sent on Mon Apr 30 00:00:00 EST 2007 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 04/30/2007 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Signed NCL saved as attachment. | ||||||||||
| Attachments: | |||||||||||
| Attachment Date: | 04/30/2007 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | NCL Report | ||||||||||
| View Attachment | |||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Site Inspection Activity Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Major Out of Compliance | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| On-Site Start Date: | 04/30/2007 | ||||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 04/30/2007 | Activity Closed By: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 04/30/2007 | User: | DURRANCE_WK_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 3-10,000 gal. single walled UST's, 1-10,000 double walled UST. Using spill bucket, ball check valves for overfill protection. Using mechanical line leak detectors, SIR, visual monitoring, and vacuum monitoring of double walled tank interstice for release detection. FR- reviewed exp. 12/5/07 CFR on site expired, provided new CFR form for current year. Placard displayed exp. 6/30/07 RDRL on site SIR reviewed from 1/06 to 5/06. Inclusive report given for diesel 5/06 SIR *NOTE SIR's are no longer properly being conducted. Annaul line tightness test not conducted. Due 8/9/2006. Annual mechanical line leak detector test not conducted. Due 8/9/2006 Tank tightness test due 8/9/2008 Monthly inspections reviewed from 4/21/06-10/06 Performed by ECS Environmental. No monthly inspections available for review from 10/06 to 4/30/07. Vacuum gauge monitoring has not been conducted since 10/2006 Diesel sump entirely full of water. Please remove water. Other sumps contain soil up to and over pump base-please remove soil to expose pump bases. Vacumm gauge reading 12psi. Dispenser liners 1,3,5,and 9 completly full of water. Shear valves are severly corroded. Please remove water and have shear valves inspected for damage. Other dispensers-OK All spill buckets contain some product. Hoses and nozzles-OK *NOTE* The in operable diesel dispenser has the nozzle broken off and laying on ground by dispenser, hose is hanging lose next to dispenser causing a possible hazard. *NOTE* on of the vent stacks is severly bent or possibly broken. Need to have vents checked and repaired. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1010 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.450(2)(a)1., 62-761.450(2)(a)2., 62-761.450(2)(a)3., 62-761.450(2)(a)4., 62-761.450(2)(a)5., 62-761.450(2)(a)6., 62-761.450(2)(a)7. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Multiple incidents occurring at the same time at the facility may be reported on one form. #1-3 - Evidence of these types of INF situations are generally found during the inspector's paperwork review. Ask the facility representative what action they took in response, and in what time frame. If the situations are resolved within 24 hours, the owner/operator is not required to submit an INF to the local program. However, the actions they took to resolve the issue must be documented. #4-5, and 7 - Evidence of these types of situations are generally found during the outside or physical portion of the inspection. Give the facility owner/operator 24 hours to resolve, provided they document their actions. If they can not resolve the issues then they must submit the INF, at which time the two week investigative window opens. #6 - Evidence of this type of situation may be found during the physical examination of the release detection device (e.g. alarm mode), or during the examination of the records associated with the method. Note: Inspectors may find events that qualify as incidents during their review of the facility's paperwork. Such issues must have been resolved within 24 hours if an INF was not submitted at the time of the event. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1077 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.610(3)(a)2.a., 62-761.610(3)(a)2.b. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | There are two types of piping leak detectors. 1. Mechanical (flow restrictive), 2. Electronic (automatic shutoff). Mark this as out of compliance if single-walled pressurized small diameter piping in contact with the soil does not have a line leak detector, isn't conducting an annual tightness test, or doesn't have an external release detection method. Rule 62-761.610(1)(b) covers release detection for Category-C UST systems. Rule 62-761.610(2) deals with release detection for Category-A and B UST systems. Rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.610(3)(a)2, 62-761.610(3)(b) & 62-761.610(3)(c) deal with all piping release detection. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | 6/14/07. No change. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1100 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(e)1., 62-761.640(3)(e)2., 62-761.640(3)(e)3., 62-761.640(3)(e)4., 62-761.640(3)(e)5. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if SIR results are not calculated properly. Calculated Leak Rate [CLR]- a quantitative expression in gph, calculated to determine the leak status of a tank. A positive gph value may be indicative of product leaking out of the tank system and a negative gph value may be indicative of a volume gain to the tank. Leak Threshold [LT]- represents the action level portion of the leak rate. While the performance standard is 0.2 gph, the threshold is generally one half that rate. Examine the DEP Master Equipment book for the SIR version in use. Minimum Detectable Leak Rate [MDL]- is the smallest leak rate the vendor can determine for the data provided with a Pd of 95% or higher. If the CLR < LT and MDL < 0.2 gph, then the result is a PASS If the MDL > 0.2 gph and CLR < LT, then the result is an INCONCLUSIVE If the CLR > LT, then the result is a FAIL | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Some SIR missing calculated leak rate or report date. Some SIR reports produced later than 20 days after the end of the month. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | 6/14/07, no resolution. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | 6/14/2007. Diesel sump full of water, inner lid was floating. Diesel dispenser liners contained some product. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1117 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)3. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility must prove that all release detection devices, such as in line leak detectors, sump and liner sensors, ATGs, etc. function properly. Sensing devices may be optical, vapor, float activated, discriminating, non-discriminating, or tied into electrical circuits. ATG probes inside of tanks require calibration testing, if used for release detection as well as inventory measurements. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | 6/14/07, no resolution. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1101 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(e)9. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | May use the approved form, or if another form is used, then verify that the form used contains all data from Form .900(7). | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Some months records fail to record all required information. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1093 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(a)3.a., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.b., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.c. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Look at the equipment and the records. Compare the current vacuum readings with the original vacuum readings at installation (if available). Mark this as out of compliance if the vacuum has decreased by more than 20%. Repairs should be noted under rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)2, 62-761.700(1)(a)3, 62-761.700(1)(a)4, 62-761.700(1)(a)5 & 62-761.700(1)(a)6. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Some months record vacuum readings, most do not. Vacuum readings have varied widely from a low of 16 mm Hg to a high of 16 mm Hg. Please verify that the vacuum gauges are accurate. Please apply to have vacuum readings approved for use at this site. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1062 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.600(1)(d) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2). | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | No resolution. 6/14/07. | ||||||||||
| 04/30/2007 | Violation Closed | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1123 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3) | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 06/20/2007 | User: | MARSH_L | ||||||||
| Description: | Not all records were available on 6/14/07. | ||||||||||
| 02/12/2007 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 02/12/2007 | ||||||||||
| 09/27/2006 | Emergency Preparedness Information Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Result: | Satisfied | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Activity Closed Date: | 09/28/2006 | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: ALTUN_M, SITE MANAGER Email: Melike.Altun@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 05/02/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11720834 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8520880 ON 04/25/2006 BY DURRANCE_W. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 05/02/2006 USER: W DURRANCE OF DESOTO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: ALTUN_M, SITE MANAGER Email: Melike.Altun@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 05/02/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11720834 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8520880 ON 04/25/2006 BY DURRANCE_W. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 05/02/2006 USER: W DURRANCE OF DESOTO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: ALTUN_M, SITE MANAGER Email: Melike.Altun@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 05/02/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11720834 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8520880 ON 04/25/2006 BY DURRANCE_W. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 05/02/2006 USER: W DURRANCE OF DESOTO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: ALTUN_M, SITE MANAGER Email: Melike.Altun@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 05/02/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11720834 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8520880 ON 04/25/2006 BY DURRANCE_W. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 05/02/2006 USER: W DURRANCE OF DESOTO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: ALTUN_M, SITE MANAGER Email: Melike.Altun@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 05/02/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11720834 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8520880 ON 04/25/2006 BY DURRANCE_W. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 05/02/2006 USER: W DURRANCE OF DESOTO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: ALTUN_M, SITE MANAGER Email: Melike.Altun@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 05/02/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11720834 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8520880 ON 04/25/2006 BY DURRANCE_W. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 05/02/2006 USER: W DURRANCE OF DESOTO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: ALTUN_M, SITE MANAGER Email: Melike.Altun@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 05/02/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11720834 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8520880 ON 04/25/2006 BY DURRANCE_W. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 05/02/2006 USER: W DURRANCE OF DESOTO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: ALTUN_M, SITE MANAGER Email: Melike.Altun@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 05/02/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11720834 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8520880 ON 04/25/2006 BY DURRANCE_W. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 05/02/2006 USER: W DURRANCE OF DESOTO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 05/02/2006 | Comment | MIGRATION | |||||||||
| Description: | COMMUNICATION: TO: ALTUN_M, SITE MANAGER Email: Melike.Altun@dep.state.fl.us Email Date: 05/02/2006 ACTIVITY ID: 11720834 - TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED AT FACILITY ID: 8520880 ON 04/25/2006 BY DURRANCE_W. EVALUATION RESULT = MINOR OUT-OF-COMPLIANCE. ACTIVITY RECORDED ON 05/02/2006 USER: W DURRANCE OF DESOTO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | ||||||||||
| 04/25/2006 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1101 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(e)9. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | May use the approved form, or if another form is used, then verify that the form used contains all data from Form .900(7). | ||||||||||
| 04/25/2006 | Legacy Activity | Durrance, William K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 04/25/2006 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1105 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs? | ||||||||||
| 04/25/2006 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1115 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.700(1)(c)1. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water". | ||||||||||
| 04/25/2006 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1093 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(a)3.a., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.b., 62-761.640(3)(a)3.c. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Look at the equipment and the records. Compare the current vacuum readings with the original vacuum readings at installation (if available). Mark this as out of compliance if the vacuum has decreased by more than 20%. Repairs should be noted under rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)2, 62-761.700(1)(a)3, 62-761.700(1)(a)4, 62-761.700(1)(a)5 & 62-761.700(1)(a)6. | ||||||||||
| 04/25/2006 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Criteria ID: | 1100 | ||||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761.640(3)(e)1., 62-761.640(3)(e)2., 62-761.640(3)(e)3., 62-761.640(3)(e)4., 62-761.640(3)(e)5. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | Mark this as out of compliance if SIR results are not calculated properly. Calculated Leak Rate [CLR]- a quantitative expression in gph, calculated to determine the leak status of a tank. A positive gph value may be indicative of product leaking out of the tank system and a negative gph value may be indicative of a volume gain to the tank. Leak Threshold [LT]- represents the action level portion of the leak rate. While the performance standard is 0.2 gph, the threshold is generally one half that rate. Examine the DEP Master Equipment book for the SIR version in use. Minimum Detectable Leak Rate [MDL]- is the smallest leak rate the vendor can determine for the data provided with a Pd of 95% or higher. If the CLR < LT and MDL < 0.2 gph, then the result is a PASS If the MDL > 0.2 gph and CLR < LT, then the result is an INCONCLUSIVE If the CLR > LT, then the result is a FAIL | ||||||||||
| 09/07/2004 | Legacy Activity | Harrison, Billy L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/03/2004 | Violation Closed | Harrison, Billy L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(c)1 | ||||||||||
| 05/03/2004 | Legacy Activity | Harrison, Billy L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 05/03/2004 | Violation Closed | Harrison, Billy L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 710(1) | ||||||||||
| 05/03/2004 | Violation Closed | Harrison, Billy L. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 600(1)(h) | ||||||||||
| 10/21/2002 | Legacy Activity | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK COMPLIANCE RE-INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 09/11/2002 | Legacy Activity | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 08/26/2002 | Violation Closed | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | SNC-B | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 600(1)(h) | ||||||||||
| 08/26/2002 | Legacy Activity | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 08/26/2002 | Violation Closed | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(a)1 | ||||||||||
| 08/26/2002 | Violation Closed | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(c)1 | ||||||||||
| 08/26/2002 | Violation Closed | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 710(1) | ||||||||||
| 02/15/2002 | Legacy Activity | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK CLOSURE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 01/11/2002 | Legacy Activity | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK INSTALLATION - FINAL INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 12/19/2001 | Legacy Activity | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | SITE VISIT | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 09/17/2001 | Legacy Activity | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK COMPLIANCE RE-INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 08/22/2001 | Violation Closed | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(c)1 | ||||||||||
| 08/22/2001 | Legacy Activity | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 10/09/2000 | Legacy Activity | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK COMPLIANCE RE-INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 08/21/2000 | Violation Closed | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(c)1 | ||||||||||
| 08/21/2000 | Legacy Activity | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| 08/21/2000 | Violation Closed | Keene, Keith K. | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 700(1)(c)3 | ||||||||||
| 06/23/1998 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 12/03/2008 | User: | THAYER_JD_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | Brenda Williams (863) 499-5418 | ||||||||||
| 06/23/1998 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/03/2009 | User: | HALE_JS_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | See Install Inspection for photos. Could not put in Tough book. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/12/2016 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2016/1/11 - TXI - Closure Inspection, by removal, for Tank #1 - 1000 GL. and Tank #2 - 4000 GL. - Steel, Single wall, Aboveground Storage tanks within containment with single wall pipng within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection monthly with documentation. North Walton County employees conducted the storage tank removal. No Closure Assessment is required for this tank removal since both tanks were placed inside secondary containment upon installation. Also, there has not been a reported spill or discharge at this location at this time. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/12/2016 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2016/1/11 - TIN - Installation Inspection for Tank #4 - Alabama, Fireguard, Double Wall, Steel, Aboveground, Storage Tank (EQ #336). Piping - Galvanized Steel, Aboveground, Suction Piping, with no contact with the soil. Release Detection - Kruger Visual, Site Gauge for the a tank Interstice. Overfill Protection - Morrison Bros. Clock Gauges with Overfill Alarms. Emergency shutoff installed at this time. Contractor - PETRO Flow, Inch - PCC #1256798 - 850-271-0120 No Closure Assessment Required for this installation. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 09/25/2014 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2014/09/24 - TCI - Tank #1 - 1000 GL. & Tank #2 - 4000 GL. - Steel, Single wall, Aboveground Storage tanks within containment with single wall piping within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection monthly with documentation. 2014/09/24 - TCI - Tank #3 - Single wall steel tanks within containment with single wall piping within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection once monthly and containment also. 250 gallon tank. | ||||||||||
| 06/23/1998 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/03/2009 | User: | HALE_JS_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | See Install Inspection for photos. Could not put in Tough book. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/12/2016 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2016/1/11 - TXI - Closure Inspection, by removal, for Tank #1 - 1000 GL. and Tank #2 - 4000 GL. - Steel, Single wall, Aboveground Storage tanks within containment with single wall pipng within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection monthly with documentation. North Walton County employees conducted the storage tank removal. No Closure Assessment is required for this tank removal since both tanks were placed inside secondary containment upon installation. Also, there has not been a reported spill or discharge at this location at this time. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/12/2016 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2016/1/11 - TIN - Installation Inspection for Tank #4 - Alabama, Fireguard, Double Wall, Steel, Aboveground, Storage Tank (EQ #336). Piping - Galvanized Steel, Aboveground, Suction Piping, with no contact with the soil. Release Detection - Kruger Visual, Site Gauge for the a tank Interstice. Overfill Protection - Morrison Bros. Clock Gauges with Overfill Alarms. Emergency shutoff installed at this time. Contractor - PETRO Flow, Inch - PCC #1256798 - 850-271-0120 No Closure Assessment Required for this installation. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 09/25/2014 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2014/09/24 - TCI - Tank #1 - 1000 GL. & Tank #2 - 4000 GL. - Steel, Single wall, Aboveground Storage tanks within containment with single wall piping within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection monthly with documentation. 2014/09/24 - TCI - Tank #3 - Single wall steel tanks within containment with single wall piping within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection once monthly and containment also. 250 gallon tank. | ||||||||||
| 06/23/1998 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/03/2009 | User: | HALE_JS_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | See Install Inspection for photos. Could not put in Tough book. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/12/2016 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2016/1/11 - TXI - Closure Inspection, by removal, for Tank #1 - 1000 GL. and Tank #2 - 4000 GL. - Steel, Single wall, Aboveground Storage tanks within containment with single wall pipng within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection monthly with documentation. North Walton County employees conducted the storage tank removal. No Closure Assessment is required for this tank removal since both tanks were placed inside secondary containment upon installation. Also, there has not been a reported spill or discharge at this location at this time. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/12/2016 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2016/1/11 - TIN - Installation Inspection for Tank #4 - Alabama, Fireguard, Double Wall, Steel, Aboveground, Storage Tank (EQ #336). Piping - Galvanized Steel, Aboveground, Suction Piping, with no contact with the soil. Release Detection - Kruger Visual, Site Gauge for the a tank Interstice. Overfill Protection - Morrison Bros. Clock Gauges with Overfill Alarms. Emergency shutoff installed at this time. Contractor - PETRO Flow, Inch - PCC #1256798 - 850-271-0120 No Closure Assessment Required for this installation. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 09/25/2014 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2014/09/24 - TCI - Tank #1 - 1000 GL. & Tank #2 - 4000 GL. - Steel, Single wall, Aboveground Storage tanks within containment with single wall piping within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection monthly with documentation. 2014/09/24 - TCI - Tank #3 - Single wall steel tanks within containment with single wall piping within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection once monthly and containment also. 250 gallon tank. | ||||||||||
| 06/23/1998 | Violation Closed | Unknown, User | |||||||||
| Significance: | Minor | Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Rule: | 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762, 62-761/762 | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 02/03/2009 | User: | HALE_JS_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | See Install Inspection for photos. Could not put in Tough book. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/12/2016 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2016/1/11 - TXI - Closure Inspection, by removal, for Tank #1 - 1000 GL. and Tank #2 - 4000 GL. - Steel, Single wall, Aboveground Storage tanks within containment with single wall pipng within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection monthly with documentation. North Walton County employees conducted the storage tank removal. No Closure Assessment is required for this tank removal since both tanks were placed inside secondary containment upon installation. Also, there has not been a reported spill or discharge at this location at this time. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 01/12/2016 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2016/1/11 - TIN - Installation Inspection for Tank #4 - Alabama, Fireguard, Double Wall, Steel, Aboveground, Storage Tank (EQ #336). Piping - Galvanized Steel, Aboveground, Suction Piping, with no contact with the soil. Release Detection - Kruger Visual, Site Gauge for the a tank Interstice. Overfill Protection - Morrison Bros. Clock Gauges with Overfill Alarms. Emergency shutoff installed at this time. Contractor - PETRO Flow, Inch - PCC #1256798 - 850-271-0120 No Closure Assessment Required for this installation. | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||
| Comment Date: | 09/25/2014 | User: | BRAZILE_DO_1 | ||||||||
| Description: | 2014/09/24 - TCI - Tank #1 - 1000 GL. & Tank #2 - 4000 GL. - Steel, Single wall, Aboveground Storage tanks within containment with single wall piping within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection monthly with documentation. 2014/09/24 - TCI - Tank #3 - Single wall steel tanks within containment with single wall piping within containment. suction system with anti-siphon valve installed on each tank. Tanks have tight fill, Fillrite pumps feed vehicles through synthetic hoses. Release detection is performed by sticking tank, Visual inspection once monthly and containment also. 250 gallon tank. | ||||||||||
| 06/23/1998 | Legacy Activity | Sams, Steven L. | |||||||||
| Activity Name: | UST ROUTINE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | Activity Status: | Closed | ||||||||
| Completion Notes: | N | ||||||||||